Seminars in diagnostic pathology · 2005
The role of immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of urinary bladder neoplasms.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
McKenney Jesse K, Amin Mahul B
Аннотация
The spectrum of neoplasms involving the urinary bladder is diverse, and, at times, different entities with distinct prognostic and managerial implications may have significant morphologic overlap. The presence of a neoplasm with an unusual morphologic appearance, such as an undifferentiated spindled, or plasmacytoid pattern may necessitate immunohistochemistry to establish the diagnosis. In this review, we discuss a series of distinct diagnostic scenarios, including high-grade undifferentiated carcinoma versus prostatic adenocarcinoma, enteric-type adenocarcinoma versus secondary colorectal adenocarcinoma, spindle cell proliferations, neoplasms with plasmacytoid morphology, endophytic tumors with a nested growth pattern, and flat urothelial lesions with atypia. We also discuss markers supporting urothelial differentiation in the context of a metastatic carcinoma from an unknown primary. The importance of using a morphologically derived differential diagnosis to guide the selection and interpretation of immunohistochemical studies is emphasized, and the varying utility (specificity) of the individual immunohistochemical markers within each setting is addressed.