MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1056/nejmoa2505752

Медицинская библиотека · The New England journal of medicine · 2025

Intravenous Rehydration for Severe Acute Malnutrition with Gastroenteritis.

Maitland Kathryn, Ouattara San Maurice, Sainna Hadiza, Chara Abdullahi, Ogundipe Oluwakemi F, Sunyoto Temmy, Hamaluba M, Olupot-Olupot Peter, Alaroker Florence, Connon Roisin, Saidou Maguina Amadou, Okiror William, Amorut Denis, Mwajombo Eric, Oguda Emmanuel, Mogaka Christabel, Langendorf Céline, Dewez Juan Emmanuel, Ciglenecki Iza, Gibb Diana M, Coldiron Matthew E, Petrucci Roberta, George Elizabeth C, GASTROSAM Trial Group

Клиническое исследование II фазыEquivalence TrialСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

International recommendations advise against the use of intravenous rehydration therapy in children with severe acute malnutrition because of the concern about fluid overload, but evidence to support this concern is lacking. Given the high mortality associated with the current recommendations, the adoption of intravenous rehydration strategies might improve outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a factorial, open-label superiority trial in four countries in Africa. Children 6 months to 12 years of age with severe acute malnutrition with gastroenteritis and dehydration underwent randomization in a 2:1:1 ratio to one of three rehydration strategies: oral rehydration, plus intravenous boluses for shock; a rapid intravenous strategy that consisted of lactated Ringer's solution (100 ml per kilogram of body weight) administered over a period of 3 to 6 hours, with boluses for shock; or a slow intravenous strategy that consisted of the same solution administered over a period of 8 hours, with no boluses. The primary end point was death at 96 hours.

RESULTS

A total of 272 children underwent randomization; 138 were assigned to the oral strategy, 67 to the rapid intravenous strategy, and 67 to the slow intravenous strategy. Participants were followed for 28 days. A nasogastric tube was used for oral rehydration in 126 of 135 participants (93%) in the oral group and in 82 of 126 (65%) in the intravenous groups. Intravenous boluses were administered at admission in 12 participants (9%) in the oral group, 7 (10%) in the rapid intravenous group, and none in the slow intravenous group. At 96 hours, 11 participants (8%) in the oral group and 9 (7%) in the intravenous groups (5 in the rapid group and 4 in the slow group) had died (risk ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41 to 2.52; P = 0.69). At 28 days, 17 participants (12%) in the oral group and 14 (10%) in the intravenous groups had died (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.41 to 1.78). Serious adverse events occurred in 32 participants (23%) in the oral group, 14 (21%) in the rapid intravenous group, and 10 (15%) in the slow intravenous group. No evidence of pulmonary edema, heart failure, or fluid overload was noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Among children with severe acute malnutrition and gastroenteritis, no evidence of a difference in mortality at 96 hours was noted between oral and intravenous rehydration strategies. (Funded by the Joint Global Health Trials scheme and others; GASTROSAM Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN76149273.).

Для цитирования: Maitland Kathryn, Ouattara San Maurice, Sainna Hadiza, Chara Abdullahi, Ogundipe Oluwakemi F, Sunyoto Temmy, Hamaluba M, Olupot-Olupot Peter, Alaroker Florence, Connon Roisin, Saidou Maguina Amadou, Okiror William, Amorut Denis, Mwajombo Eric, Oguda Emmanuel, Mogaka Christabel, Langendorf Céline, Dewez Juan Emmanuel, Ciglenecki Iza, Gibb Diana M, Coldiron Matthew E, Petrucci Roberta, George Elizabeth C, GASTROSAM Trial Group. Intravenous Rehydration for Severe Acute Malnutrition with Gastroenteritis.. The New England journal of medicine. 2025. DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2505752.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.