The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025
Organ-specific proteomic aging and cognitive performance: Implications for risk prediction of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias in older adults.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kang Sujin, Baker Susan, Hayhoe Benedict, Price Geraint, Novak Gerald, Wong Janice, Middleton Lefkos, Robinson Oliver
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Biological aging, characterized by cellular and molecular changes, may play a key role in neurodegenerative diseases. While recent proteomic advancements have introduced new aging clocks, widespread validation remains necessary. This study evaluated organ-specific and cognition-enriched proteomic clocks in relation to chronological age and cognitive change.
METHODS: We analyzed plasma proteomic data from the CHARIOT PRO SubStudy (N = 409), measured using the SomaScan assay (version 4.1) at four time points over three years (months 0, 12, 24, and 36). Using published proteomic organ age weights, we calculated conventional, organ-specific, and cognition-enriched biological ages and compared them with chronological age. Adjusted multilevel regression analyses assessed associations between baseline proteomic AgeGaps (biological-chronological age differences) and cognitive performance over 54 months.
RESULTS: The cohort (mean age: 71.8 ± 5.5 years; 50.1 % female) showed moderate to strong correlations between proteomic ages and chronological age (r = 0.37-0.80; MAE = 4.2-2.7). Over three years, AgeGaps increased across the conventional, organismal, muscle, liver, artery, and immune systems, ranging from 2.1 ± 1.9 to 1.0 ± 2.3 years. The artery AgeGap was most strongly associated with cognitive decline, with conventional and organismal AgeGaps showing similar patterns. Higher baseline AgeGap z-scores (i.e., greater biological age) in the artery and brain were associated with poorer cognition, as measured by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Total Scores (Coeff. -3.0, 95 % CI: -3.4, -2.5; and -1.1, 95 % CI: -1.5, -0.6) and the Preclinical Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite (Coeff. -0.5, 95 % CI: -0.6, -0.4; and -0.14, 95 % CI: -0.3, -0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the interplay between neurological function and cardiovascular aging in cognitive decline. Organ-specific biological age assessments may aid in the early detection of age-related changes, informing personalized interventions. Our study underscores the importance of proteomic aging signatures in elucidating Alzheimer's disease mechanisms and other neurodegenerative conditions, advocating for an integrated approach to brain and cardiovascular health.
METHODS: We analyzed plasma proteomic data from the CHARIOT PRO SubStudy (N = 409), measured using the SomaScan assay (version 4.1) at four time points over three years (months 0, 12, 24, and 36). Using published proteomic organ age weights, we calculated conventional, organ-specific, and cognition-enriched biological ages and compared them with chronological age. Adjusted multilevel regression analyses assessed associations between baseline proteomic AgeGaps (biological-chronological age differences) and cognitive performance over 54 months.
RESULTS: The cohort (mean age: 71.8 ± 5.5 years; 50.1 % female) showed moderate to strong correlations between proteomic ages and chronological age (r = 0.37-0.80; MAE = 4.2-2.7). Over three years, AgeGaps increased across the conventional, organismal, muscle, liver, artery, and immune systems, ranging from 2.1 ± 1.9 to 1.0 ± 2.3 years. The artery AgeGap was most strongly associated with cognitive decline, with conventional and organismal AgeGaps showing similar patterns. Higher baseline AgeGap z-scores (i.e., greater biological age) in the artery and brain were associated with poorer cognition, as measured by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Total Scores (Coeff. -3.0, 95 % CI: -3.4, -2.5; and -1.1, 95 % CI: -1.5, -0.6) and the Preclinical Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite (Coeff. -0.5, 95 % CI: -0.6, -0.4; and -0.14, 95 % CI: -0.3, -0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the interplay between neurological function and cardiovascular aging in cognitive decline. Organ-specific biological age assessments may aid in the early detection of age-related changes, informing personalized interventions. Our study underscores the importance of proteomic aging signatures in elucidating Alzheimer's disease mechanisms and other neurodegenerative conditions, advocating for an integrated approach to brain and cardiovascular health.