Comparison of Using Intraoperative Computed Tomography-Based 3-Dimensional Navigation and Fluoroscopy in Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion for Cervical Spondylosis.

OBJECTIVE

Anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a highly successful procedure to treat spinal cord or nerve root compression; however, complications can still occur. With advancements in imaging, 3-dimensional (3D) reconstruction allows real-time instrument tracking in a surgical field relative to the patient's anatomy. Here, we compare plate positioning and short-term outcomes when using 3D navigation to fluoroscopy in ACDF for degenerative spine disease.

METHODS

All ACDFs for cervical spondylosis performed by 6 surgeons at a single center between 2010 and 2018 were included. ACDFs were divided into those performed using 3D navigation or fluoroscopy. Records were assessed for patient demographics, American Society of Anesthesiology score, number of operated interspaces, operative time, length of stay, perioperative complications, and 90-day readmissions. Postoperative images were reviewed for lateral and angular plate deviations.

RESULTS

A total of 193 ACDFs performed with 3D navigation and 728 performed with fluoroscopy were included. After controlling for demographics and surgical characteristics, using 3D navigation was associated with less lateral plate deviation (P = 0.048) and longer operative times per interspace (P < 0.001) but was not associated with angular plate deviation (P = 0.724), length of stay (P = 0.393), perioperative complications (P = 0.844), and 90-day readmissions (P = 0.539).

CONCLUSIONS

Using 3D navigation in ACDF for degenerative disease is associated with slightly more midline plate positioning and comparable short-term outcomes as using fluoroscopy and can be a suitable alternative. Advantages of using this technology, such as improved visualization of anatomy, should be weighed against disadvantages, such as increased operative time, on a per-patient basis.