MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/mds.29879

Медицинская библиотека · Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2024

Impact of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Markers on the Diagnostic Performance of the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society Multiple System Atrophy Criteria.

Wilkens Ida, Heine Johanne, Ruf Viktoria C, Compta Yaroslau, Porcel Laura Molina, Troakes Claire, Vamanu Albert, Downes Sophia, Irwin David, Cohen Jesse, Lee Edward B, Nilsson Christer, Englund Elisabet, Nemati Mojtaba, Katzdobler Sabrina, Levin Johannes, Pantelyat Alex, Seemiller Joseph, Berger Stephen, van Swieten John, Dopper Elise, Rozenmuller Annemieke, Kovacs Gabor G, Bendahan Nathaniel, Lang Anthony E, Herms Jochen, Höglinger Günter, Hopfner Franziska

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Multiple system atrophy is a neurodegenerative disease with α-synuclein aggregation in glial cytoplasmic inclusions, leading to dysautonomia, parkinsonism, and cerebellar ataxia.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to validate the accuracy of the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society Multiple System Atrophy clinical diagnostic criteria, particularly considering the impact of the newly introduced brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) markers.

METHODS

Diagnostic accuracy of the clinical diagnostic criteria for multiple system atrophy was estimated retrospectively in autopsy-confirmed patients with multiple system atrophy, Parkinson's disease, progressive supranuclear palsy, and corticobasal degeneration.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 240 patients. Sensitivity of the clinically probable criteria was moderate at symptom onset but improved with disease duration (year 1: 9%, year 3: 39%, final ante mortem record: 77%), whereas their specificity remained consistently high (99%-100% throughout). Sensitivity of the clinically established criteria was low during the first 3 years (1%-9%), with mild improvement at the final ante mortem record (22%), whereas specificity remained high (99%-100% throughout). When MRI features were excluded from the clinically established criteria, their sensitivity increased considerably (year 1: 3%, year 3: 22%, final ante mortem record: 48%), and their specificity was not compromised (99%-100% throughout).

CONCLUSIONS

The International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society multiple system atrophy diagnostic criteria showed consistently high specificity and low to moderate sensitivity throughout the disease course. The MRI markers for the clinically established criteria reduced their sensitivity without improving specificity. Combining clinically probable and clinically established criteria, but disregarding MRI features, yielded the best sensitivity with excellent specificity and may be most appropriate to select patients for therapeutic trials. © 2024 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Для цитирования: Wilkens Ida, Heine Johanne, Ruf Viktoria C, Compta Yaroslau, Porcel Laura Molina, Troakes Claire, Vamanu Albert, Downes Sophia, Irwin David, Cohen Jesse, Lee Edward B, Nilsson Christer, Englund Elisabet, Nemati Mojtaba, Katzdobler Sabrina, Levin Johannes, Pantelyat Alex, Seemiller Joseph, Berger Stephen, van Swieten John, Dopper Elise, Rozenmuller Annemieke, Kovacs Gabor G, Bendahan Nathaniel, Lang Anthony E, Herms Jochen, Höglinger Günter, Hopfner Franziska. Impact of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Markers on the Diagnostic Performance of the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society Multiple System Atrophy Criteria.. Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society. 2024. DOI: 10.1002/mds.29879.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.