Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques · 2015
Laparoscopy Combined With Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery for Rectal Cancer: A Prospective, Single-blinded, Randomized Clinical Trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chen Yueyu, Guo Runsheng, Xie Jinbi, Liu Zhaohui, Shi Peidong, Ming Qiu
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopy combined with transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) in the treatment of rectal cancer.
METHODS: A total of 60 rectal cancer patients who underwent radical resection from December 2009 to December 2013 were enrolled in this study. All patients were randomly divided to receive either laparoscopic surgery (LA group) or laparoscopy combined with TEM (LT group). Demographics including age and sex, and tumor characteristics including tumor size, distance from anal verge, and preoperative staging were all recorded. The operation time, hospital stay, cases with intraoperative blood transfusion, the number of resected lymph node, postoperative out-of-bed activity, passage of gas by anus, fasting time, and postoperative complications were assessed.
RESULTS: Compared with the LA group, patients in the LT group had shorter operation time (118.5±22.0 vs. 138.1±23.8 min, P=0.002), earlier out-of-bed activity (60.4±19.2 vs. 83.6±9.6 h, P=0.001) and passage of gas by anus (81.4±5.4 vs. 86.2±8.7 h, P=0.013), and shorter hospital stay (8.0±2.8 vs. 11.0±3.5 d, P=0.001). Patients were followed up for a median time of 28 months (range, 3 to 48 mo). No local recurrence and distant metastasis occurred in all cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy combined with TEM is a feasible and effective treatment for radical excision of middle-upper rectal cancer due to the advantages of lower morbidity and earlier recovery.
METHODS: A total of 60 rectal cancer patients who underwent radical resection from December 2009 to December 2013 were enrolled in this study. All patients were randomly divided to receive either laparoscopic surgery (LA group) or laparoscopy combined with TEM (LT group). Demographics including age and sex, and tumor characteristics including tumor size, distance from anal verge, and preoperative staging were all recorded. The operation time, hospital stay, cases with intraoperative blood transfusion, the number of resected lymph node, postoperative out-of-bed activity, passage of gas by anus, fasting time, and postoperative complications were assessed.
RESULTS: Compared with the LA group, patients in the LT group had shorter operation time (118.5±22.0 vs. 138.1±23.8 min, P=0.002), earlier out-of-bed activity (60.4±19.2 vs. 83.6±9.6 h, P=0.001) and passage of gas by anus (81.4±5.4 vs. 86.2±8.7 h, P=0.013), and shorter hospital stay (8.0±2.8 vs. 11.0±3.5 d, P=0.001). Patients were followed up for a median time of 28 months (range, 3 to 48 mo). No local recurrence and distant metastasis occurred in all cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy combined with TEM is a feasible and effective treatment for radical excision of middle-upper rectal cancer due to the advantages of lower morbidity and earlier recovery.