MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/js9.0000000000002262

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025

Comparison of the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer patients: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Zeng De-Xin, Liu Ruo-Nan, Ren Xian-Kun, Zhang Peng, Tang Ling-Han, Tan Ling, Ur Rehman Zia, Zhao Mao-Ru, Guo Peng, Zhang Pan, Du Jun, Qin Xian, Wan Shi-Yan, Deng Lu-Qian, Luo Ya-Jun, Liu Zi-Lin, Xiao Jiang-Wei

СтатьяМетаанализСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is considered to be the standard treatment strategy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC); however, the risk of adverse events and postoperative recurrence remains significant. This study aimed to evaluate the non-inferiority of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) compared with nCRT in patients with LARC and to assess the possibility of eliminating radiotherapy on the basis of guaranteed efficacy.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of nCRT and nCT for LARC. The study protocol was registered with the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO).

RESULTS

A total of 2706 patients from seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) between the nCT and nCRT groups. This study demonstrated a lower rate of infection (OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.34-0.82; P = 0.005), anastomotic leak (OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.34-0.87; P = 0.01), tumor regression grade (TRG) 0-1 (OR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.36-0.69; P < 0.0001), preventive diverting ileostomy (OR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.17-1.02; P = 0.05), and leukopenia (OR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.25-1.01; P = 0.05) in the nCT group. However, there was no significant difference in the other toxic events, such as intestinal obstruction, urinary complications, diarrhea, and surgical or pathological outcomes, such as clinical fistula, sphincter preservation, postoperative mortality (≤ 60 d), R0 resection, ypStage 0-I, positive circumferential resection margin (CRM+), or pathological complete response (pCR) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

This study indicated that OS and DFS were not lower in the nCT group than in the nCRT group. In addition, the nCT group had fewer complications. Preoperative nCT is expected to become a standard treatment option for most patients with stage II-III LARC. It is worth noting that radiotherapy cannot be ignored for some patients who need to ensure the conversion effect of neoadjuvant therapy and strongly request to preserve organ function.

Для цитирования: Zeng De-Xin, Liu Ruo-Nan, Ren Xian-Kun, Zhang Peng, Tang Ling-Han, Tan Ling, Ur Rehman Zia, Zhao Mao-Ru, Guo Peng, Zhang Pan, Du Jun, Qin Xian, Wan Shi-Yan, Deng Lu-Qian, Luo Ya-Jun, Liu Zi-Lin, Xiao Jiang-Wei. Comparison of the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer patients: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.. International journal of surgery (London, England). 2025. DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000002262.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.