British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2021
Comparison between physiologically based pharmacokinetic and population pharmacokinetic modelling to select paediatric doses of gepotidacin in plague.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nguyen Dung, Shaik Jafar Sadik, Tai Guoying, Tiffany Courtney, Perry Caroline, Dumont Etienne, Gardiner David, Barth Aline, Singh Rajendra, Hossain Mohammad
Аннотация
AIMS: To develop physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) and population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) models to predict effective doses of gepotidacin in paediatrics for the treatment of pneumonic plague (Yersinia pestis).
METHODS: A gepotidacin PBPK model was constructed using a population-based absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion simulator, Simcyp®, with physicochemical and in vitro data, optimized with clinical data from a dose-escalation intravenous (IV) study and a human mass balance study. A PopPK model was developed with pooled PK data from phase 1 studies with IV gepotidacin in healthy adults.
RESULTS: For both the PopPK and PBPK models, body weight was found to be a key covariate affecting gepotidacin clearance. With PBPK, ~90% of the predicted PK for paediatrics fell between the 5th and 95th percentiles of adult values except for subjects weighing ≤5 kg. PopPK-simulated paediatric means for Cmax and AUC(0-τ) were similar to adult exposures across various weight brackets. The proposed dosing regimens were weight-based for subjects ≤40 kg and fixed-dose for subjects >40 kg. Comparison of observed and predicted exposures in adults indicated that both PBPK and PopPK models achieved similar AUC and Cmax for a given dose, but the Cmax predictions with PopPK were slightly higher than with PBPK. The two models differed on dose predictions in children <3 months old. The PopPK model may be suboptimal for low age groups due to the absence of maturation characterization of drug-metabolizing enzymes involved with clearance in adults.
CONCLUSIONS: Both PBPK and PopPK approaches can reasonably predict gepotidacin exposures in children.
METHODS: A gepotidacin PBPK model was constructed using a population-based absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion simulator, Simcyp®, with physicochemical and in vitro data, optimized with clinical data from a dose-escalation intravenous (IV) study and a human mass balance study. A PopPK model was developed with pooled PK data from phase 1 studies with IV gepotidacin in healthy adults.
RESULTS: For both the PopPK and PBPK models, body weight was found to be a key covariate affecting gepotidacin clearance. With PBPK, ~90% of the predicted PK for paediatrics fell between the 5th and 95th percentiles of adult values except for subjects weighing ≤5 kg. PopPK-simulated paediatric means for Cmax and AUC(0-τ) were similar to adult exposures across various weight brackets. The proposed dosing regimens were weight-based for subjects ≤40 kg and fixed-dose for subjects >40 kg. Comparison of observed and predicted exposures in adults indicated that both PBPK and PopPK models achieved similar AUC and Cmax for a given dose, but the Cmax predictions with PopPK were slightly higher than with PBPK. The two models differed on dose predictions in children <3 months old. The PopPK model may be suboptimal for low age groups due to the absence of maturation characterization of drug-metabolizing enzymes involved with clearance in adults.
CONCLUSIONS: Both PBPK and PopPK approaches can reasonably predict gepotidacin exposures in children.