MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/asj/sjaf206

Медицинская библиотека · Aesthetic surgery journal · 2026

Submandibular Gland Reduction in the Modern Necklift Surgery: A Systematic Literature Review.

Shauly Orr, Dhawan Ravi, Gould Daniel J

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Submandibular gland prominence can undermine aesthetic outcomes in neck and lower face rejuvenation, even after deep-plane facelifts and platysmaplasty. In selected patients, gland reduction has emerged as an effective adjunct to improve cervicomental contour. In this systematic review, the authors analyze 51 studies involving 2971 patients undergoing submandibular gland reduction across 6 surgical approaches, including transcervical, necklift-integrated, intraoral, retroauricular, endoscopic, and robotic-assisted techniques. The overall complication rate was 15.1%, with marginal mandibular nerve injury being most common (9.8%). Minimally invasive methods, particularly endoscopic and intraoral, showed lower hematoma rates and faster recovery with high patient satisfaction. Retroauricular approaches yielded excellent aesthetic outcomes but had the highest nerve injury rates. LigaSure-assisted and partial reductions reduced bleeding and preserved function. Despite generally favorable results, variation in technique, outcome reporting, and patient selection limits broader adoption. Standardized protocols and prospective studies are needed to optimize safety, aesthetic benefit, and long-term results in submandibular gland contouring for facial rejuvenation. Level of Evidence: 3 (Therapeutic).

Для цитирования: Shauly Orr, Dhawan Ravi, Gould Daniel J. Submandibular Gland Reduction in the Modern Necklift Surgery: A Systematic Literature Review.. Aesthetic surgery journal. 2026. DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjaf206.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.