MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jflm.2015.02.008

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of forensic and legal medicine · 2015

Anal lesions presenting in a cohort of child gastroenterological examinations. Implications for sexual traumatic injuries.

Rougé-Maillart Clotilde, Houdu Sora, Darviot Estelle, Buchaillet Céline, Baron Céline

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The purpose of this study was to describe the anal lesions found in children during a pediatric gastroenterology consultation when the reason for the complaint was related to a digestive disease. This prospective descriptive study included 100 children under 15 years of age over a 13-month period, consulting due to digestive symptoms. The children were under 8 years old (90%) and 25% were under 3.1 years old. Constipation was the most frequent reason for consultation (69%). Fifty-one anal lesions were observed, of which 58.8% were anal fissures, 15.7% were skin tags and 5.8% were venous congestions related to straining. Anal fissures and skin tags were located at the median line, according to the clock-face method in supine position. No child had more than two anal lesions. No anal dilatation, sphincter hypotonia, anal scars, anal lacerations or bruises were found. The two most common anal lesions were anal fissures and skin tags. These anal lesions were mainly observed at the median line and were due to constipation. No cases of multiple anal lesions were found in terms of common digestive diseases.

Для цитирования: Rougé-Maillart Clotilde, Houdu Sora, Darviot Estelle, Buchaillet Céline, Baron Céline. Anal lesions presenting in a cohort of child gastroenterological examinations. Implications for sexual traumatic injuries.. Journal of forensic and legal medicine. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2015.02.008.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.