Epidural Analgesia Decreases Narcotic Requirements in Patients with Low Level Spina Bifida Undergoing Urological Laparotomy for Neurogenic Bladder and Bowel.

PURPOSE: Concerns regarding anatomical anomalies and worsening neurological symptoms have prevented widespread use of epidural catheters in patients with low level spina bifida. We hypothesize that thoracic epidural placement in the T9 to T10 interspace is safe and decreases narcotic requirements following major open lower urinary tract reconstruction in patients with low level spina bifida.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

We reviewed consecutive patients with low level spina bifida who underwent lower urinary tract reconstruction and received epidurals for postoperative pain control. Controls were patients with low level spina bifida who received single injection transversus abdominis plane blocks and underwent similar procedures. Complications of epidural placement, including changes in motor and sensory status, were recorded. Opioid consumption was calculated using equivalent intravenous morphine doses. Mean and maximum pain scores on postoperative days 0 to 3 were calculated.

RESULTS

Ten patients with low level spina bifida who underwent lower urinary tract reconstruction with epidural were matched to 10 controls with low level spina bifida who underwent lower urinary tract reconstruction with transverse abdominis plane block. Groups were demographically similar. All patients had full abdominal sensation and functional levels at or below L3. No epidural complications or changes in neurological status were noted. The epidural group had decreased opioid consumption on postoperative days 0 to 3 (0.75 mg/kg vs 1.29 mg/kg, p = 0.04). Pain scores were similar or improved in the epidural group.

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracic epidural analgesia appears to be a safe and effective opioid sparing option to assist with postoperative pain management following lower urinary tract reconstruction in individuals with low level spina bifida.