DOI 10.1007/s00402-021-04167-6
Descriptive analysis and short-term follow-up clinical results of osteochondral lesions of the distal tibia based on data of the German Cartilage Register (Knorpelregister® DGOU).
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
An increasing number of ankle injuries with osteochondral lesions (OCL) also include lesions of the distal tibia. Therefore, the German Cartilage Society database is used to describe and examine the characteristics of these lesions and, early on, the results of different surgical therapies on the clinical outcome.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
Forty-seven patients out of 844 registered in the German Cartilage Society database met the inclusion criteria showing an OCL of the distal tibia (OLDT). Sixteen of them also presented a 1-year follow-up regarding the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). Further evaluations were included in the follow-up, such as the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and the Visual Analogue Scale for pain (VAS).
RESULTS
The patients' mean age was 35 ± 11 with a mean BMI in the range of overweight (26/27 ± 5 kg/m2). The lesions were equally distributed on the articular surface of the distal tibia. Most patients were operated using anterior ankle arthroscopy [nT 34 (72%); nS 13 (81%)], while some (nT 9; nS 4) converted to open procedures. Almost 90% staged III and IV in the ICRS classification. Debridement, bone marrow stimulation, solid scaffolds, and liquid filler were the treatment choices among the subgroup. All therapies led to a clinical improvement between pre-op and 1-year follow-up but not to a significant level.
CONCLUSION
This study presents baseline data of OLDT based on data from a large database. BMS and scaffolds were the treatment of choice but did not present significant improvement after a 1-year follow-up.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.