British journal of cancer · 2022
Efficacy and safety of radiation therapy in advanced adrenocortical carcinoma.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kimpel Otilia, Schindler Paul, Schmidt-Pennington Laura, Altieri Barbara, Megerle Felix, Haak Harm, Pittaway James, Dischinger Ulrich, Quinkler Marcus, Mai Knut, Kroiss Matthias, Polat Bülent, Fassnacht Martin
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: International guidelines emphasise the role of radiotherapy (RT) for the management of advanced adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC). However, the evidence for this recommendation is very low.
METHODS: We retrospectively analysed all patients who received RT for advanced ACC in five European centres since 2000.
PRIMARY ENDPOINT: time to progression of the treated lesion (tTTP). Secondary endpoints: best objective response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), adverse events, and the establishment of predictive factors by Cox analyses.
RESULTS: In total, 132 tumoural lesions of 80 patients were treated with conventional RT (cRT) of 50-60 Gy (n = 20) or 20-49 Gy (n = 69), stereotactic body RT of 35-50 Gy (SBRT) (n = 36), or brachytherapy of 12-25 Gy (BT) (n = 7). Best objective lesional response was complete (n = 6), partial (n = 52), stable disease (n = 60), progressive disease (n = 14). Median tTTP was 7.6 months (1.0-148.6). In comparison to cRT20-49Gy, tTTP was significantly longer for cRT50-60Gy (multivariate adjusted HR 0.10; 95% CI 0.03-0.33; p < 0.001) and SBRT (HR 0.31; 95% CI 0.12-0.80; p = 0.016), but not for BT (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.22-1.99; p = 0.46). Toxicity was generally mild and moderate with three grade 3 events. No convincing predictive factors could be established.
CONCLUSIONS: This largest published study on RT in advanced ACC provides clear evidence that RT is effective in ACC.
METHODS: We retrospectively analysed all patients who received RT for advanced ACC in five European centres since 2000.
PRIMARY ENDPOINT: time to progression of the treated lesion (tTTP). Secondary endpoints: best objective response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), adverse events, and the establishment of predictive factors by Cox analyses.
RESULTS: In total, 132 tumoural lesions of 80 patients were treated with conventional RT (cRT) of 50-60 Gy (n = 20) or 20-49 Gy (n = 69), stereotactic body RT of 35-50 Gy (SBRT) (n = 36), or brachytherapy of 12-25 Gy (BT) (n = 7). Best objective lesional response was complete (n = 6), partial (n = 52), stable disease (n = 60), progressive disease (n = 14). Median tTTP was 7.6 months (1.0-148.6). In comparison to cRT20-49Gy, tTTP was significantly longer for cRT50-60Gy (multivariate adjusted HR 0.10; 95% CI 0.03-0.33; p < 0.001) and SBRT (HR 0.31; 95% CI 0.12-0.80; p = 0.016), but not for BT (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.22-1.99; p = 0.46). Toxicity was generally mild and moderate with three grade 3 events. No convincing predictive factors could be established.
CONCLUSIONS: This largest published study on RT in advanced ACC provides clear evidence that RT is effective in ACC.