m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026

Phase I/II Study of the PARP Inhibitor Olaparib and Irinotecan in Children and Young Adults with Recurrent/Refractory Malignancies: Arm D of the AcSé-ESMART Trial.

СтатьяКлиническое исследование I фазыКлиническое исследование II фазыМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Gatz Susanne A, Berlanga Pablo, Le Teuff Gwénaël, Valiev Ivan, Leruste Amaury, André Nicolas, Bluteau Dominique, Corradini Nadege, Rubino Jonathan, Thomas Fabienne, Nebchi Souad, Karamouza Eleni, Petit Jeanne, Thebaud Estelle, Rubio-San-Simón Alba, van Eijkelenburg Natasha K A, Marshall Lynley V, Raimbault Sandra, Canete Adela, Ducassou Stephane, Makin Guy, Casanova Michela, De Carli Emilie, Petit Arnaud, Cardon Melis, Lacroix Ludovic, Pierron Gaelle, Schleiermacher Gudrun, Hubank Michael J F, Soriano Fernandez Aroa, Langenberg Karin P S, Castel David, Adam-de Beaumais Tiphaine, Paoletti Xavier, Lukka Pradeep B, Baldry Richard, Mortimer Peter G S, Nikolaev Sergey I, Geoerger Birgit

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Arm D of the AcSé-ESMART proof-of-concept phase I/II platform trial aimed to define the recommended phase II dose (RP2D), pharmacokinetics, activity, and biomarkers of the PARP inhibitor olaparib with irinotecan in pediatric patients with recurrent/refractory malignancies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Olaparib was administered orally twice daily on days 1 to 10 and irinotecan intravenously on days 4 to 8 of a 21-day cycle. Dose escalation followed the continuous reassessment method; activity was assessed in diverse tumor types (cohort 1) and Ewing sarcoma (cohort 2) according to a minimax Simon 2-stage design. Cohorts were enriched for alterations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathways.

RESULTS: Seventy patients (median age, 14.9 years; range, 5.0-23.8) were included, 34 with diverse tumor types (25 with HRR gene alterations) and 36 with Ewing sarcoma. Sixty-six patients received 348 treatment cycles (median, 2; range, 1-51) over four dose levels. Main toxicities were gastrointestinal and myelosuppression; the RP2D was olaparib 90 mg/m2 twice daily and irinotecan 20 mg/m2/day. Olaparib exposure in children was equivalent to that in adults. The overall response rate was 9.1% (cohort 1, 11.8%; cohort 2, 6.3%). Four patients with osteosarcoma, pineoblastoma, choroid plexus carcinoma, and neuroblastoma experienced a partial response and were treated for nine to 51 cycles. Two patients with Ewing sarcoma experienced a complete and a partial response for 10 and 42 cycles, respectively. Genetic analyses suggest a high aneuploidy score possibly associated with objective response and prolonged stable disease.

CONCLUSIONS: Olaparib combined with irinotecan demonstrated activity in pediatric tumors, which was enriched among tumors that exhibited aneuploidy.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты