International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology · 2019
Differentiation of sublingual thyroglossal duct cyst from midline dermoid cyst with diffusion weighted imaging.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Abdel Razek Ahmed Abdel Khalek, Sherif Fatma Mohamed
Аннотация
PURPOSE: to differentiate sublingual thyroglossal duct cyst (TGDC) from midline dermoid cyst (DC) with diffusion weighted imaging (DWI).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 22 consecutive patients (11 male and 11 female aged 5-15 years) with midline cystic lesion at floor of mouth. They underwent DWI of floor of mouth. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of the cystic lesions was calculated and correlated with surgical findings.
RESULTS: The mean ADC value of TGDC of 1st observer was (2.20 ± 0.28 × 10-3 mm2/s) and of 2nd observer was (2.28 ± 0.27 × 10-3 mm2/s) was significantly higher than that of DC (P = 0.001) whose ADC of 1st observer was (1.55 ± 0.15 × 10-3 mm2/s) and of 2nd observer was (1.53 ± 0.11 × 10-3 mm2/s). There was excellent inter-observer agreement of both readings (r = 92%, P = 0.001). When ADC of 1.76 and 1.62 × 10-3 mm2/s was used as a threshold value for differentiating TGDC from DC, the best results were obtained with area under the curve of 0.94 and 0.96, accuracy of 90% and 86%, sensitivity of 91% and 91%%, specificity of 90% and 80%, negative predictive value of 90% and 88% and positive predictive value of 92% and 84% of both reviewers respectively.
CONCLUSION: DWI is reliable and reproducible imaging modality for differentiation sublingual TGDC from DC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 22 consecutive patients (11 male and 11 female aged 5-15 years) with midline cystic lesion at floor of mouth. They underwent DWI of floor of mouth. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of the cystic lesions was calculated and correlated with surgical findings.
RESULTS: The mean ADC value of TGDC of 1st observer was (2.20 ± 0.28 × 10-3 mm2/s) and of 2nd observer was (2.28 ± 0.27 × 10-3 mm2/s) was significantly higher than that of DC (P = 0.001) whose ADC of 1st observer was (1.55 ± 0.15 × 10-3 mm2/s) and of 2nd observer was (1.53 ± 0.11 × 10-3 mm2/s). There was excellent inter-observer agreement of both readings (r = 92%, P = 0.001). When ADC of 1.76 and 1.62 × 10-3 mm2/s was used as a threshold value for differentiating TGDC from DC, the best results were obtained with area under the curve of 0.94 and 0.96, accuracy of 90% and 86%, sensitivity of 91% and 91%%, specificity of 90% and 80%, negative predictive value of 90% and 88% and positive predictive value of 92% and 84% of both reviewers respectively.
CONCLUSION: DWI is reliable and reproducible imaging modality for differentiation sublingual TGDC from DC.