Cochlear implants international · 2025
PTFE Sheets for fixation of auditory brainstem implant (ABI) stimulating probes in children may improve hearing outcomes.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Robert Behr, Marek Polak
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Fixation of the stimulating probe of auditory brainstem implants (ABI) is crucial to maintain beneficial stimulation. Use of Tetrafluorethylen (PTFE, TeflonTM) sheets as a fixation material was compared to fixation without PTFE-sheets.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis.
PATIENTS: 46 children with sensorineural hearing loss, not eligible for CI, received an ABI; 27 children without PTFE (Control Group, CG), 18 children with PTFE (TeflonTM Group, TG). Mean age of CG (46.6 months), TG (37.4 months), n.s. Mean follow-up 49.3 months (CG), 33 months (TG), n.s.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of stimulating probe dislocations, number of active electrodes, electrically evoked auditory-brainstem-response (eABR) morphology performed intraoperatively and postoperatively, maximum comfortable level (MCL), categories of auditory-performance (CAP) scores.
RESULTS: TG showed no electrode dislocations, CG had one. eABR waves varied from 2 to 5 in both groups, number of active electrodes was similar. Mean MCL was sign. lower in TG (49.2 nC) vs CG (98.6 nC). CAP scores were sign. better in TG (5.0) vs CG (4.2), after 2 years and 5.4 vs 4.6 after 3 years post-activation.
CONCLUSION: PTFE sheets proved to be an effective and stable fixation material for ABI stimulating probes, resulting in potentially better auditory outcomes as indicated by significantly lower MCLs and improved CAP scores. Compared to other fixation materials used in the CG, PTFE-sheets appear to be the better choice.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis.
PATIENTS: 46 children with sensorineural hearing loss, not eligible for CI, received an ABI; 27 children without PTFE (Control Group, CG), 18 children with PTFE (TeflonTM Group, TG). Mean age of CG (46.6 months), TG (37.4 months), n.s. Mean follow-up 49.3 months (CG), 33 months (TG), n.s.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of stimulating probe dislocations, number of active electrodes, electrically evoked auditory-brainstem-response (eABR) morphology performed intraoperatively and postoperatively, maximum comfortable level (MCL), categories of auditory-performance (CAP) scores.
RESULTS: TG showed no electrode dislocations, CG had one. eABR waves varied from 2 to 5 in both groups, number of active electrodes was similar. Mean MCL was sign. lower in TG (49.2 nC) vs CG (98.6 nC). CAP scores were sign. better in TG (5.0) vs CG (4.2), after 2 years and 5.4 vs 4.6 after 3 years post-activation.
CONCLUSION: PTFE sheets proved to be an effective and stable fixation material for ABI stimulating probes, resulting in potentially better auditory outcomes as indicated by significantly lower MCLs and improved CAP scores. Compared to other fixation materials used in the CG, PTFE-sheets appear to be the better choice.