Journal of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism : JPEM · 2020
The utility of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in localizing primary/metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma in children and adolescents - a single-center experience.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jaiswal Sanjeet Kumar, Sarathi Vijaya, Malhotra Gaurav, Hira Priya, Shah Ravikumar, Patil Virendra A, Dalvi Abhay, Prakash Gagan, Lila Anurag R, Shah Nalini S, Bandgar Tushar
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Pediatric pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL) are rare tumors with limited data on the diagnostic performance of 68Ga-DOTA(0)-Tyr(3)-octreotate positron emission tomography-computed tomography (68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT). We have described our experience of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in overall and von Hippel Lindau (VHL)-associated pediatric PPGL and compared its sensitivity with that of 131I-meta-iodobenzyl-guanidine (131I-MIBG), 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT (18F-FDG PET/CT), and contrast-enhanced CT (CECT).
METHODS: Retrospective evaluation of consecutive PPGL patients (age: ≤20 years), who had undergone at least one functional imaging [131I-MIBG, 18F-FDG PET/CT, and/or 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT], was done. Composite of anatomical and all the performed functional imaging scans, image comparator (IC), was considered as the gold standard for sensitivity analysis.
RESULTS: In a cohort of 32 patients (16 males, age at diagnosis: 16.4 ± 2.68 years), lesion-wise sensitivity of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT (95%) was higher than that of both 18F-FDG-PET/CT (80%, p=0.027) and 131I-MIBG (65%, p=0.0004) for overall lesions, than that of 18F-FDG-PET/CT (100 vs. 67%, p=0.017) for primary PPG, and than that of 131I-MIBG (93 vs. 42%, p=0.0001) for metastases. In the VHL (n=14), subgroup, 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT had higher lesion-wise sensitivity (100%) compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT (74%, p=0.045) and 131I-MIBG (64%, p=0.0145).
CONCLUSIONS: In our pediatric PPGL cohort, overall lesion-wise sensitivity of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT was higher than that of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 131I-MIBG scintigraphy. Hence, we recommend 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT as the preferred modality in pediatric PPGL. 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT may evolve as a preferred imaging modality for disease surveillance in VHL.
METHODS: Retrospective evaluation of consecutive PPGL patients (age: ≤20 years), who had undergone at least one functional imaging [131I-MIBG, 18F-FDG PET/CT, and/or 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT], was done. Composite of anatomical and all the performed functional imaging scans, image comparator (IC), was considered as the gold standard for sensitivity analysis.
RESULTS: In a cohort of 32 patients (16 males, age at diagnosis: 16.4 ± 2.68 years), lesion-wise sensitivity of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT (95%) was higher than that of both 18F-FDG-PET/CT (80%, p=0.027) and 131I-MIBG (65%, p=0.0004) for overall lesions, than that of 18F-FDG-PET/CT (100 vs. 67%, p=0.017) for primary PPG, and than that of 131I-MIBG (93 vs. 42%, p=0.0001) for metastases. In the VHL (n=14), subgroup, 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT had higher lesion-wise sensitivity (100%) compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT (74%, p=0.045) and 131I-MIBG (64%, p=0.0145).
CONCLUSIONS: In our pediatric PPGL cohort, overall lesion-wise sensitivity of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT was higher than that of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 131I-MIBG scintigraphy. Hence, we recommend 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT as the preferred modality in pediatric PPGL. 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT may evolve as a preferred imaging modality for disease surveillance in VHL.