Shaping the curve from the microscopic transsphenoidal to the endoscopic endonasal approach for the sellar region.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the limitations, barriers, and complications in the early transition from the microscopic transsphenoidal approach (MTA) to the endonasal endoscopic approach (EEA) to the skull base in our institution.

METHODS

Technical challenges, as well as clinical features and complications, were compared between MTA, EEA, and mixed cases during the early surgical curve.

RESULTS

The period from the early learning curve was 1 year until the EEA protocol was used routinely. A total of 34 patients registered a resection using a transsphenoidal approach. Eighteen patients underwent EEA, 11 underwent MTA, and five underwent a mixed endonasal and microscopic approach. Non-significant differences were found in endocrine outcomes between the three groups. Patients with unchanged or improved visual function were higher in the EEA group (p = 0.147). Non-significant differences were found in terms of the extent of resection (EOR) between groups (p = 0.369). Only 1 (2.9%) patient in the whole series developed a post-operative CSF leaking that resolved with medical management, belonging to the EEA group (5.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The early phase of the learning curve did not affect our series significantly in terms of the EOR, endocrine status, and visual outcomes.