Surgical implications of urachal remnants: Presentation and management.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The abdominal manifestations of urachal remnants often prompt referral to the pediatric general surgeon. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the authors' management of this anomaly.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective review of patients presenting to their institution with urachal remnants between 1984 and 2001. Clinical and radiographic details of presentation, management, and outcomes are described.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients presented at a median age of 4 years (range, 2 days to 12 years), 16 were boys, and 18 required inpatient care. Eleven (42%) presented with infection, 7 (27%) with clear drainage, 3 (12%) with umbilical polyps/granulation, 3 (12%) with pain, one (4%) with recurrent urinary tract infections, and one (4%) with an asymptomatic punctum. One had an associated anomaly (hypospadias). Urinalysis and urine cultures did not correlate with infection. Ultrasound scan was diagnostic in greater than 90% of cases. Overall, 20 patients underwent primary cyst excision, and 6 underwent incision and drainage (I&D) with delayed excision. Five patients underwent primary excision while infected, and 2 had postoperative complications (wound infection and urine leak). All 6 patients who underwent 2-stage procedure initially presented with infection, and none had complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Persistent urachal remnants can present at any age with a variety of clinical manifestations. Ultrasound scan is a reliable diagnostic tool. Additional diagnostic studies generally are not warranted. Simple excision of noninfected lesions is appropriate. In cases of acute infection, initial I&D with delayed cyst excision may be preferable to avoid unnecessary complications.