International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2014
Impact of lymph node ratio and number on survival in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma after preoperative chemo radiation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bhatti Abu Bakar Hafeez, Akbar Ali, Hafeez Aqsa, Syed Aamir Ali, Khattak Shahid, Jamshed Arif, Kazmi Ather Saeed
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Retrieval of <12 lymph nodes after proctectomy and preoperative chemoradiation (C-XRT) may improve survival in good risk patients. The objective of this study was to determine impact of <12 retrieved lymph nodes and lymph node ratio (LNR) on survival in a population with certain poor prognostic features for rectal cancer.
METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery for rectal adenocarcinoma between 2005 and 2011 were divided them into <12 or >12 lymph node groups. The LNR groups were based on interquartile range. Clinicopathological and treatment outcomes were compared. Expected 5 year disease free and overall survival was calculated. Cox proportional hazard model was used to determine independent predictors.
RESULTS: More patients in <12 lymph nodes removed group had low tumors (<5 cm from anal verge) (75.5% versus 60.7%) (P=0.03) and underwent abdominoperineal resection (59.1% versus 42.9%) (P=0.02). Overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) was not different [(56% and 52% (P=0.7)] [(50% and 57% (P=0.5)]. LNR<0.15 was independent predictor of DFS while LNR ratio<0.12 for OS on multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSION: LNR and not number of retrieved nodes impacts survival in younger patients with predominance of anorectal tumors after C-XRT. A specific LNR cutoff remains to be defined.
METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery for rectal adenocarcinoma between 2005 and 2011 were divided them into <12 or >12 lymph node groups. The LNR groups were based on interquartile range. Clinicopathological and treatment outcomes were compared. Expected 5 year disease free and overall survival was calculated. Cox proportional hazard model was used to determine independent predictors.
RESULTS: More patients in <12 lymph nodes removed group had low tumors (<5 cm from anal verge) (75.5% versus 60.7%) (P=0.03) and underwent abdominoperineal resection (59.1% versus 42.9%) (P=0.02). Overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) was not different [(56% and 52% (P=0.7)] [(50% and 57% (P=0.5)]. LNR<0.15 was independent predictor of DFS while LNR ratio<0.12 for OS on multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSION: LNR and not number of retrieved nodes impacts survival in younger patients with predominance of anorectal tumors after C-XRT. A specific LNR cutoff remains to be defined.