MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.urology.2010.01.020

Медицинская библиотека · Urology · 2010

Factors predicting success in hypospadias repair using preputial flap with limited pedicle mobilization (Asopa procedure).

Singh Bhupendra P, Solanki Fanindra S, Kapoor Rahul, Dassi Vimal, Kaswan Harish K, Agrawal Vipul, Swain Sanjaya K, Andankar Mukund G, Pathak Hemant R

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the objective factors determining success in hypospadias repair by the Asopa technique of limited preputial pedicle mobilization.

METHODS

This was a prospective study involving a cohort of 48 patients (age range 1-19 years) who underwent hypospadias repair in a tertiary care teaching institution, with a follow-up of 20-58 months. Patient inclusion criteria were absence of past history of any local surgery with urethral plate less than 6 mm and hooded prepuce.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 33.5 months, the overall complication and fistula rates were 22.9% and 16.7%. Complication and fistula rates were 40% and 30% with tube repairs vs. 18.4% and 13.2% with onlay repairs.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients unsuitable for Snodgrass repair, the Asopa technique of transverse preputial flap repair provides reasonably good results. Patients with proximal hypospadias, conical glans configuration, tube repairs, and more advanced age had higher complication rates with transverse preputial flap repair.

Для цитирования: Singh Bhupendra P, Solanki Fanindra S, Kapoor Rahul, Dassi Vimal, Kaswan Harish K, Agrawal Vipul, Swain Sanjaya K, Andankar Mukund G, Pathak Hemant R. Factors predicting success in hypospadias repair using preputial flap with limited pedicle mobilization (Asopa procedure).. Urology. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.01.020.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.