MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s12943-024-02053-4

Медицинская библиотека · Molecular cancer · 2024

Distinct pattern of genomic breakpoints in CML and BCR::ABL1-positive ALL: analysis of 971 patients.

Hovorkova Lenka, Winkowska Lucie, Skorepova Justina, Krumbholz Manuela, Benesova Adela, Polivkova Vaclava, Alten Julia, Bardini Michela, Meyer Claus, Kim Rathana, Trahair Toby N, Clappier Emmanuelle, Chiaretti Sabina, Henderson Michelle, Sutton Rosemary, Sramkova Lucie, Stary Jan, Polakova Katerina Machova, Marschalek Rolf, Metzler Markus, Cazzaniga Giovanni, Cario Gunnar, Trka Jan, Zaliova Marketa, Zuna Jan

Письмо в редакциюПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The BCR::ABL1 is a hallmark of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and is also found in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Most genomic breaks on the BCR side occur in two regions - Major and minor - leading to p210 and p190 fusion proteins, respectively.

METHODS

By multiplex long-distance PCR or next-generation sequencing technology we characterized the BCR::ABL1 genomic fusion in 971 patients (adults and children, with CML and ALL: pediatric ALL: n = 353; pediatric CML: n = 197; adult ALL: n = 166; adult CML: n = 255 patients) and designed "Break-App" web tool to allow visualization and various analyses of the breakpoints. Pearson's Chi-Squared test, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and logistic regression were used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Detailed analysis showed a non-random distribution of breaks in both BCR regions, whereas ABL1 breaks were distributed more evenly. However, we found a significant difference in the distribution of breaks between CML and ALL. We found no association of breakpoints with any type of interspersed repeats or DNA motifs. With a few exceptions, the primary structure of the fusions suggests non-homologous end joining being responsible for the BCR and ABL1 gene fusions. Analysis of reciprocal ABL1::BCR fusions in 453 patients showed mostly balanced translocations without major deletions or duplications.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, our data suggest that physical colocalization and chromatin accessibility, which change with the developmental stage of the cell (hence the difference between ALL and CML), are more critical factors influencing breakpoint localization than presence of specific DNA motifs.

Для цитирования: Hovorkova Lenka, Winkowska Lucie, Skorepova Justina, Krumbholz Manuela, Benesova Adela, Polivkova Vaclava, Alten Julia, Bardini Michela, Meyer Claus, Kim Rathana, Trahair Toby N, Clappier Emmanuelle, Chiaretti Sabina, Henderson Michelle, Sutton Rosemary, Sramkova Lucie, Stary Jan, Polakova Katerina Machova, Marschalek Rolf, Metzler Markus, Cazzaniga Giovanni, Cario Gunnar, Trka Jan, Zaliova Marketa, Zuna Jan. Distinct pattern of genomic breakpoints in CML and BCR::ABL1-positive ALL: analysis of 971 patients.. Molecular cancer. 2024. DOI: 10.1186/s12943-024-02053-4.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.