MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.surg.2013.10.015

Медицинская библиотека · Surgery · 2013

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of simultaneous resection of primary colorectal cancer and synchronous colorectal liver metastases.

Yoshioka Ryuji, Hasegawa Kiyoshi, Mise Yoshihiro, Oba Masaru, Aoki Taku, Sakamoto Yoshihiro, Sugawara Yasuhiko, Sunami Eiji, Watanabe Toshiaki, Kokudo Norihiro

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear whether primary colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases (SLMs) should be resected simultaneously or with a staged procedure.

METHODS

We reviewed the short-term outcomes of 127 patients who underwent simultaneous resection of primary colorectal cancer and SLM at our institution from January 1993 to December 2011.

RESULTS

The proportion of simultaneous resections was 84.7% (127 of 150 patients). There was no postoperative mortality, and the postoperative complication rate was 61.4%. Major complications occurred in 23 (18.2%) patients, and anastomotic failure occurred in 2 (1.6%). The 3-, 5-, and 10-year overall survival rates were 74%, 64%, and 52%, respectively. The median recurrence-free survival period was 7.0 months (95% confidence interval, 4.5-9.5 months) and the 5-year recurrence-free survival rate was 17%.

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous resection can be performed safely in patients with colorectal cancer and SLM.

Для цитирования: Yoshioka Ryuji, Hasegawa Kiyoshi, Mise Yoshihiro, Oba Masaru, Aoki Taku, Sakamoto Yoshihiro, Sugawara Yasuhiko, Sunami Eiji, Watanabe Toshiaki, Kokudo Norihiro. Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of simultaneous resection of primary colorectal cancer and synchronous colorectal liver metastases.. Surgery. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.10.015.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.