Urology · 2023
Posterior Sagittal Approach Provides Optimal Exposure for Urethral Reconstruction in Children With a History of Anorectal Malformations.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tyraskis Athanasios, El-Sayed Jana, Tiusaba Laura, Jacobs Shimon E, Russell Teresa L, Feng Christina, Teeple Erin, Ho Christina P, Pohl Hans G, Badillo Andrea T, Levitt Marc A, Varda Briony K
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To present a unique series of children with previously repaired anorectal malformations (ARM) with subsequent urethral pathology repaired via a posterior sagittal exposure and highlight the associated technical advantages.
METHODS: Using a retrospective review of all procedures performed in our pediatric colorectal and pelvic reconstruction program from January 2020 through December 2022, we compiled a case series of patients with a history of ARM and prior posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) who had urethral pathology and concurrent indication for redo-PSARP. Clinical features, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were collected.
RESULTS: Six male patients presented at a median age of 4.3 years, all born with an ARM of recto-urinary fistula type, of which 3 were recto-prostatic, 1 recto-bladder-neck, and 2 unknown type. In addition to redo-PSARP, 2 underwent remnant of the original fistula excision and 4 had urethral stricture repair. One required post-operative Heineke-Mikulicz anoplasty. Patients underwent cystoscopy 4-6 weeks post-reconstruction, and none showed urethral stricture requiring treatment. Post-procedurally, 5 patients were able to void urethrally and 1 required additional bladder augmentation/Mitrofanoff.
CONCLUSION: Redo-PSARP completely mobilizes the rectum, thereby providing excellent exposure to the posterior urethra for repair. This approach also allows the option of a rectal flap for augmented urethroplasty as well as harvest of an ischiorectal fat pad for interposition.
METHODS: Using a retrospective review of all procedures performed in our pediatric colorectal and pelvic reconstruction program from January 2020 through December 2022, we compiled a case series of patients with a history of ARM and prior posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) who had urethral pathology and concurrent indication for redo-PSARP. Clinical features, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were collected.
RESULTS: Six male patients presented at a median age of 4.3 years, all born with an ARM of recto-urinary fistula type, of which 3 were recto-prostatic, 1 recto-bladder-neck, and 2 unknown type. In addition to redo-PSARP, 2 underwent remnant of the original fistula excision and 4 had urethral stricture repair. One required post-operative Heineke-Mikulicz anoplasty. Patients underwent cystoscopy 4-6 weeks post-reconstruction, and none showed urethral stricture requiring treatment. Post-procedurally, 5 patients were able to void urethrally and 1 required additional bladder augmentation/Mitrofanoff.
CONCLUSION: Redo-PSARP completely mobilizes the rectum, thereby providing excellent exposure to the posterior urethra for repair. This approach also allows the option of a rectal flap for augmented urethroplasty as well as harvest of an ischiorectal fat pad for interposition.