[Magnetic resonance cholangiographic (MRCP) features of ischemic-type biliary lesions (ITBL): a case-control study].
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the spectrum of MR cholangiography (MRCP) features of ischemic-type biliary lesions (ITBL) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
30 patients (16 m, 14 f) with an average age of 52 years (9 - 69 y) were examined in two 1.5 MR units using breath-hold 2D-SS-FSE-sequences and 3D-MRCP sequences. 20 of the 30 patients had an established ITBL, and the remaining 10 patients were post-OLT controls. MRCPs were evaluated independently by two experienced radiologists that were blinded to the clinical history as well as the results of other imaging modalities. All images were analyzed for the presence of 16 different pathological features. Differences between ITBL patients and controls were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney-U Test. Inter-rater variability was tested using the Cohen's Kappa test.
RESULTS
Abnormal findings of bile ducts were seen in all patients. The most common findings were (in percentage for reader 1 / 2) intrahepatic bile duct dilatation (95 % / 95 %) and extrahepatic bile duct stenoses (95 % / 85 %), followed by intrahepatic main duct stenoses (90 % / 95 %) and segmental duct stenoses (85 % / 85 %). Differences between ITBL patients and controls were significant for most of the analyzed features (Mann-Whitney-U test, p < 0.05). For 12 of 16 features, there was substantial or almost perfect agreement (κ = 0.61 - 1.00), for 2 of 16 features moderate agreement (κ = 0.41- 0.60) and for 2 of 16 features fair agreement (κ < 0.40).
CONCLUSION
In patients with ITBL, MR cholangiography reveals characteristic features that may allow differentiation from other biliary complications after liver transplantation.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.