MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1067/mhn.2002.126590

Медицинская библиотека · Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2002

Management of pediatric ranula.

Pandit Rajiv T, Park Albert H

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Many surgical techniques to manage ranulas have been described in the literature. These techniques include excision of the cyst with or without excision of the ipsilateral sublingual gland, marsupialization, cryosurgery, and CO(2) laser excision. Few studies have described the approach toward management in pediatric patients.

METHODS

Six patients were treated for intraoral ranulas. Two patients had spontaneous resolution of their lesions. Four patients required dissection of the submandibular duct and lingual nerve to completely excise an oral cavity ranula and an ipsilateral sublingual gland.

RESULTS

There were no recurrent lesions. One patient developed a lingual nerve injury but no numbness. The 2 patients with spontaneous resolution did not develop a subsequent lesion.

CONCLUSION

Optimal management of pediatric oral cavity ranulas may include observation for 5 months for spontaneous resolution. If the lesion does not resolve or recurs repeatedly, surgical treatment is recommended. Submandibular duct dissection with relocation appears to enhance exposure to the floor of mouth. The pseudocyst and entire sublingual gland should be removed. Identification of the lingual nerve is necessary to accomplish this goal.

Для цитирования: Pandit Rajiv T, Park Albert H. Management of pediatric ranula.. Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2002. DOI: 10.1067/mhn.2002.126590.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.