Immunopharmacology and immunotoxicology · 2025
Efficacy and safety of ibuprofen and naproxen in the treatment of oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis: bi-national cohort study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ohana Orly, Marmor Itay, Ferguson Rina, Levinsky Yoel, Rubin Shiri, Baszis Kevin, Tal Rotem, Harel Liora, Peled Orit, Amarilyo Gil
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common rheumatic disease in children. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and intra-articular corticosteroid injections are first-line therapy for oligoarticular JIA. NSAIDs Adverse events (AEs) include gastrointestinal ulcers/bleeding and impaired renal function. The most prescribed NSAIDs for oligoarticular JIA are ibuprofen and naproxen. However, direct comparison between these drugs is lacking. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ibuprofen versus naproxen for oligoarticular JIA.
METHODS: This is a bi-national retrospective study of oligoarticular JIA patients treated with either ibuprofen or naproxen as first-line therapy. Efficacy was defined as patients that achieved complete response (no evidence for arthritis). Safety was assessed by the occurrence of adverse events during follow-up.
RESULTS: Of 164 patients, 103 were treated in the Israeli group and 61 in the US group. The study population had a mean age of 4.49 ± 3.55 years, with F:M ratio of ∼2.5:1. No significant difference was found in drug efficacy [Complete response was observed in 15% of the ibuprofen group vs. 17.3% in naproxen group (p = 0.7)]. Treatment duration > 28 days was associated with significantly higher odds for complete response (p = 0.021). For safety, 12 AEs were associated with naproxen, whereas no AEs were associated with ibuprofen (p = 0.004). Treatment was discontinued in all AEs cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Ibuprofen and naproxen showed similar albeit low efficacy which emphasizes their role as bridging therapy until IACI is achieved. However, ibuprofen showed better safety profile naproxen and therefore should be considered as first-line therapy.
METHODS: This is a bi-national retrospective study of oligoarticular JIA patients treated with either ibuprofen or naproxen as first-line therapy. Efficacy was defined as patients that achieved complete response (no evidence for arthritis). Safety was assessed by the occurrence of adverse events during follow-up.
RESULTS: Of 164 patients, 103 were treated in the Israeli group and 61 in the US group. The study population had a mean age of 4.49 ± 3.55 years, with F:M ratio of ∼2.5:1. No significant difference was found in drug efficacy [Complete response was observed in 15% of the ibuprofen group vs. 17.3% in naproxen group (p = 0.7)]. Treatment duration > 28 days was associated with significantly higher odds for complete response (p = 0.021). For safety, 12 AEs were associated with naproxen, whereas no AEs were associated with ibuprofen (p = 0.004). Treatment was discontinued in all AEs cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Ibuprofen and naproxen showed similar albeit low efficacy which emphasizes their role as bridging therapy until IACI is achieved. However, ibuprofen showed better safety profile naproxen and therefore should be considered as first-line therapy.