Brain imaging investigation of the neural correlates of emotional autobiographical recollection.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of ketotifen 0.025% ophthalmic solution (one drop/eye) with placebo as adjunctive therapy to mometasone nasal spray (50 microg/spray, two puffs/nostril) in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (SARC).

STUDY

DESIGN

Single-centre, randomised, double-masked, two-treatment, two-period crossover study.

SETTING

8-hour allergen challenge in the Vienna Challenge Chamber.

STUDY

PARTICIPANTS

Subjects were >/=18 years old, had a >/=2-year history of SARC, and were sufficiently responsive to allergen challenge.

INTERVENTIONS: During each challenge, subjects received a single dose of mometasone + ketotifen or mometasone + placebo.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND

RESULTS

47 subjects were randomised, and 44 completed both treatment sequences. Efficacy was based on mean area under the curve (AUC) values for symptom relief scores over time, with the primary variable being the AUC 4-6 hours postdose (AUC(4-6)) for relief of ocular itching. Between-treatment differences were assessed using analysis of variance. While improvement in ocular itching (AUC(4-6)) was observed with both treatments, improvement was significantly (p = 0.014) better with mometasone + ketotifen versus mometasone + placebo, as was improvement based on AUC(0-6) (p = 0.009) and AUC(0-2) (p = 0.006). Similar trends (in favour of mometasone + ketotifen) were observed for improvements in ocular redness, running nose, sneezing and ocular/nasal composite scores (p </= 0.05). None of the safety findings (slit-lamp biomicroscopy, vital signs, adverse events) were clinically significant. One subject discontinued treatment due to mild pharyngitis.

CONCLUSION

Ketotifen eye drops adjunctive to mometasone nasal spray provided greater relief of both ocular and nasal signs and symptoms than mometasone alone in subjects with SARC.