MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.23736/s0390-5616.16.03774-7

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of neurosurgical sciences · 2016

Reappraisal of the posterior approach for cervical decompressive herniectomy.

Bacigaluppi Susanna, Bragazzi Nicola L, Zella Samis, Prada Francesco, Zavanone Mario L, Rampini Paolo

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Does posterior cervical herniectomy impact on symptoms related to cervical paramedian/lateral soft disc herniation?

METHODS

In a patient series over 15 years operated for single level paramedian/lateral soft disc herniation with posterior cervical approach, perceived radicular and cervical pre- and postoperative symptoms were reconstructed and analyzed.

RESULTS

Out of 105 patients with these characteristics 75 could be recruited for long-term follow-up. Preoperative symptoms included: radicular motor deficit (81.3%); radicular pain (93.3%); radicular sensory deficit (84%); cervical pain (80%) and disturbance of cervical motility (49.3%). Postoperatively radicular motor score improved in all patients (score 5 in 92% and 4 in 8%); sensory disturbance improved in all and radicular pain disappeared in 90% and improved in the others. Cervical pain disappeared in 78% and improved in other 22%, two had new onset moderate cervical pain.

CONCLUSIONS

This series confirms safety and efficacy of the posterior approach in relieving motor and sensory symptoms in patients with symptomatic single level, lateral soft disc herniation.

Для цитирования: Bacigaluppi Susanna, Bragazzi Nicola L, Zella Samis, Prada Francesco, Zavanone Mario L, Rampini Paolo. Reappraisal of the posterior approach for cervical decompressive herniectomy.. Journal of neurosurgical sciences. 2016. DOI: 10.23736/s0390-5616.16.03774-7.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.