DOI 10.1016/j.neuchi.2024.101593
Surgical management of herniated intervertebral disc in children.
Аннотация
STUDY
DESIGN
Retrospective literature review analysis
OBJECTIVE
Analyze the risk factors, characteristics, outcome, and follow up of surgical management of disc herniation in children ≤15 years old (y.o) through a review of the literature.
BACKGROUND
Disc herniation is a rare disease in the pediatric population. While conservative treatment if very often tried, some cases require surgical treatment.
METHODS
A literature search was conducted using PubMed data base using the terms 'pediatric/children/adolescent disc herniation' and 'surgical management' as key words. Significant manuscripts i.e: case reports, case series, reviews were identified and analyzed. The exclusion criteria were: series and cases with patients >15 y.o, results non-individualizable and medical management.
RESULTS
49 studies were identified, 28 were retained. 69 children <15 y.o were identified with a median age of 13 y.o (SD 1-15). The mean FU was 3.3 years. Trauma and repeated micro traumatism were identified as the main causes of disc herniation in this population. It is mostly a lumbar disease, with very anecdotic cases of thoracic or cervical herniation described. In the absence of neurological deficit, conservative treatment should be tried. Different types of surgery exist (open, endoscopic, tubular), with no difference in outcome or complications. The post-operative outcome was very satisfactory, with no neurological sequalae described with excellent recovery.
CONCLUSIONS
Pediatric disc herniation is often caused by precipitating factors such as trauma. In the absence of resolution with conservative treatment, surgical options yield favorable short term clinical outcomes with minimal complications and no neurological sequalae.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.