MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/bpo.0000000000002681

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of pediatric orthopedics · 2024

ChatGPT Responses to Common Questions About Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: A Reliable Resource for Parents?

Adelstein Jeremy M, Sinkler Margaret A, Li Lambert T, Mistovich R Justin

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

We sought to evaluate the ability of ChatGPT, an AI-powered online chatbot, to answer frequently asked questions (FAQs) regarding slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE).

METHODS

Seven FAQs regarding SCFE were presented to ChatGPT. Initial responses were recorded and compared with evidence-based literature and reputable online resources. Responses were subjectively rated as "excellent response requiring no further clarification," "satisfactory response requiring minimal clarification," "satisfactory response requiring moderate clarification," or "unsatisfactory response requiring substantial clarification."

RESULTS

ChatGPT was frequently able to provide satisfactory responses that required only minimal clarification. One response received an excellent rating and required no further clarification, while only 1 response from ChatGPT was rated unsatisfactory and required substantial clarification.

CONCLUSIONS

ChatGPT is able to frequently provide satisfactory responses to FAQs regarding SCFE while appropriately reiterating the importance of always consulting a medical professional.

Для цитирования: Adelstein Jeremy M, Sinkler Margaret A, Li Lambert T, Mistovich R Justin. ChatGPT Responses to Common Questions About Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: A Reliable Resource for Parents?. Journal of pediatric orthopedics. 2024. DOI: 10.1097/bpo.0000000000002681.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.