MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/md.0000000000035656

Медицинская библиотека · Medicine · 2023

The causal relationship between ever smoked and frozen shoulder: A two-sample Mendelian randomization.

Deng Guang-Hua, Wei Yong-Kang

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

To investigate the causal relationship between ever smoked and frozen shoulder using a Mendelian randomization (MR) approach. Pooled data from a large-scale genome-wide association study were used. Genetic loci that were independent of each other and associated with ever smoked and frozen shoulder in populations of European ancestry were selected as instrumental variables. Inverse variance weighting was used as the primary analysis method. Weighted median and MR-Egger were used as complementary analysis methods to assess causal effects. To explore the causal relationship between ever smoked and frozen shoulder. Sensitivity test analysis was performed using heterogeneity test, multiple validity test, and leave-one-out analysis to explore the robustness of the results. Inverse variance weighting results of ever smoked showed an OR = 2.49, 95% CI = 1.05-5.91, P = .038, indicating that ever smoked is a risk factor for a frozen shoulder. And the test revealed no heterogeneity and pleiotropy, and the sensitivity analysis also showed robust results. This study used two-sample MR analysis to analyze and explore the genetic data, and the results showed a higher prevalence of frozen shoulder in patients with ever smoked, suggesting that active control of ever smoked may reduce the occurrence of frozen shoulder.

Для цитирования: Deng Guang-Hua, Wei Yong-Kang. The causal relationship between ever smoked and frozen shoulder: A two-sample Mendelian randomization.. Medicine. 2023. DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000035656.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.