Diagnostic value of genetic testing, with focus on CACNA1A, in children with episodic neurologic disorders: a single-centre retrospective study.

BACKGROUND

Episodic neurologic disorders, such as paroxysmal torticollis, paroxysmal tonic upward gaze deviation, migraine, and episodic ataxia, represent a diagnostic challenge in paediatric patients. Variants in the CACNA1A and other genes such SCN8A and DEPDC5, have been implicated in episodic ataxia, hemiplegic migraine, and related conditions. However, the diagnostic yield of CACNA1A testing in paediatric populations with these symptoms remains uncertain.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study at Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, analysing 32 paediatric patients with episodic neurologic disorders. Clinical evaluation, neuroimaging, video EEG, and genetic testing were performed. Clinical and genetic data were correlated to identify predictors of pathogenic variants.

RESULTS

The cohort included 32 patients (21 females), with a mean age at symptom onset of 1.3 years. Paroxysmal torticollis (12/32) and paroxysmal tonic upgaze deviation (9/32) were the most frequent initial symptoms. Pathogenic variants were identified in 6/32 patients, of whom 2 carried CACNA1A variants. Positive genetic findings were significantly associated with developmental delay (p = 0.0056) and paroxysmal tonic upgaze deviation (p = 0.0185). Additional variants were identified in genes not classically linked to episodic disorders, including KAT6A, NFIX, and DEPDC5. Neuroimaging abnormalities were observed in 7/22 patients, and EEG abnormalities in 3/16.

CONCLUSIONS

Genetic testing provides important insights in the evaluation of paediatric patients with episodic neurologic disorders, particularly in those with developmental delay, paroxysmal tonic upgaze, or episodic ataxia. Although the overall diagnostic yield remained low, consistent with other paroxysmal movement disorders, these findings support the integration of genetic testing into the diagnostic algorithm and underscore the need to consider broader genetic aetiologies. Larger studies are warranted to confirm these observations.