MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/ajim.22736

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of industrial medicine · 2017

Dupuytren's contracture and handwork: A case-control study.

Haines Alfred, Levis Carolyn, Goldsmith Charles H, Kaur Manraj, Duku Eric, Wells Richard, Walter Stephen D, Rook Cheryl, Stock Susan, Liss Gary, Murphy Jessica, Thoma Achilleas

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to examine the association between Dupuytren's contracture (DC), repetitive handwork (RHW), heavy handwork (HHW), and/or vibration exposure.

METHODS

Frequency and intensity of the three types of handwork were collected and compared between DC patients and controls. Hours of work were weighted by average "frequency," for RHW, and average "intensity," for HHW and use of vibrating tool. Logistic regression was used to evaluate risk of developing DC associated with the above-mentioned factors.

RESULTS

Data from 129 cases (74 clinical, 106 controls) was analyzed. Family history, male gender and age (decades) were associated with increased risk of DC. Results indicate that the risk becomes substantial after about 30 years of steady RHW. Independent effects of intensity-weighted HHW and vibrating exposure were not established.

CONCLUSIONS

Frequency-weighted RHW increases DC risk. Additionally, a strong association between DC, male gender and heredity was found.

Для цитирования: Haines Alfred, Levis Carolyn, Goldsmith Charles H, Kaur Manraj, Duku Eric, Wells Richard, Walter Stephen D, Rook Cheryl, Stock Susan, Liss Gary, Murphy Jessica, Thoma Achilleas. Dupuytren's contracture and handwork: A case-control study.. American journal of industrial medicine. 2017. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.22736.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.