DOI 10.1016/j.exger.2026.113271
Dynamic trajectories of possible sarcopenia under the AWGS 2025 criteria and long-term prognosis: A national landmark cohort study.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Possible sarcopenia is defined by low handgrip strength in the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) 2025 consensus. Whether functional recovery under these criteria improves long-term prognosis remains unclear.
METHODS
The study included 2761 community-dwelling participants aged ≥60 years from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS, 2011-2018) who were free of baseline activities of daily living (ADL) disability. Participants were categorized into four trajectory subgroups based on their possible sarcopenia status in 2011 and 2013: Persistently Normal (72.0%), Reversed Possible Sarcopenia (10.8%), Progressive Possible Sarcopenia (10.8%), and Persistent Possible Sarcopenia (6.5%). Survey-weighted Cox and Fine-Gray competing risk models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause mortality and severe ADL disability prevalent at the 2018 follow-up.
RESULTS
During a median follow-up of 5.0 years, 258 all-cause deaths and 109 cases of prevalent severe ADL disability were documented. Persistent Possible Sarcopenia was independently associated with higher risks of all-cause mortality (HR 1.75, 95% CI 1.16-2.62) and the composite adverse outcome (HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.22-2.53), with significant ordinal trends. For the Reversed trajectory, severe ADL disability risk did not differ significantly from reference (subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) 1.40, 95% CI 0.79-2.46).
CONCLUSIONS
Persistently Normal handgrip strength predicts the most favorable prognosis, whereas Persistent Possible Sarcopenia carries higher risks of mortality and adverse outcomes. Whether sarcopenia reversal attenuates these risks awaits further study.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.