MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.08.096

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of hand surgery · 2013

A comparison of percutaneous needle fasciotomy and collagenase injection for dupuytren disease.

Nydick Jason A, Olliff Bailee W, Garcia Michael J, Hess Alfred V, Stone Jeffrey D

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To compare percutaneous needle fasciotomy (PNF) with collagenase injection in the treatment of Dupuytren contracture.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed for patients with Dupuytren disease treated with PNF or collagenase. Range of motion, patient satisfaction, and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

There were 29 patients in the collagenase group with mean baseline contractures of 40° for 22 affected metacarpophalangeal joints and 50° for 12 affected proximal interphalangeal joints. The PNF group was composed of 30 patients with mean baseline contractures of 37° for 32 affected metacarpophalangeal joints and 41° for 18 affected proximal interphalangeal joints. All patients were observed for a minimum of 3 months. Clinical success (reduction of contracture within 0° to 5° of normal) was accomplished in 35 of 50 joints (67%) in the PNF group and in 19 of 34 joints (56%) in the collagenase group. Patient satisfaction was similar between groups. Only minor complications were observed, including skin tears, ecchymosis, edema, pruritus, and lymphadenopathy.

CONCLUSIONS

In the short term, both PNF and collagenase have similar clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic III.

Для цитирования: Nydick Jason A, Olliff Bailee W, Garcia Michael J, Hess Alfred V, Stone Jeffrey D. A comparison of percutaneous needle fasciotomy and collagenase injection for dupuytren disease.. The Journal of hand surgery. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.08.096.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.