MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/1753193410397971

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of hand surgery, European volume · 2011

The efficacy and safety of fasciectomy and fasciotomy for Dupuytren's contracture in European patients: a structured review of published studies.

Crean S M, Gerber R A, Le Graverand M P Hellio, Boyd D M, Cappelleri J C

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

A structured review of published papers was done to assess the efficacy and safety of fasciectomy and fasciotomy in European patients with Dupuytren's contracture. The outcomes varied across 48 studies. For fasciectomy, outcomes and results were as follows: the proportions of patients with a 100% correction in contracture angle ranged from 61 to 97%, the mean improvement in contracture angle ranged from 58 to 79%, and cases judged excellent/good ranged from 63 to 90%. Fasciotomy had similar outcomes, with a mean improvement in contracture angle ranging from 46 to 88%. Immediate failures upon recovery were reported for both procedures. The average recurrence rates were 39% after a fasciectomy and 62% after a fasciotomy at a median time of about 4 years. Overall, about 20% of fasciectomy and fasciotomy patients experienced an adverse event. In summary, postoperative outcomes were successful, but surgical complications were common and recurrence of a contracture was likely within a few years.

Для цитирования: Crean S M, Gerber R A, Le Graverand M P Hellio, Boyd D M, Cappelleri J C. The efficacy and safety of fasciectomy and fasciotomy for Dupuytren's contracture in European patients: a structured review of published studies.. The Journal of hand surgery, European volume. 2011. DOI: 10.1177/1753193410397971.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.