European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2017
Adjacent segment pathology: natural history or effect of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion? A 10-year follow-up radiological multicenter study using an evaluation scale of the ageing spine.
Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pesce Alessandro, Wierzbicki Venceslao, Piccione Emanuele, Frati Alessandro, Raco Antonino, Caruso Riccardo
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Aim of this study is to compare late degenerative MRI changes in a subset of patients operated on with ACDF to a second subset of patients presenting indication to ACDF but never operated on.
METHODS: Patients from both subgroups received surgical indication according to the same criteria. Both subgroups underwent a cervical spine MRI in 2004-2005 and 10 years later in 2015. These MRI scans were retrospectively evaluated with a cervical spine ageing scale.
RESULTS: Comparing the two subset of patients both suffering from clinically relevant single-level disease returns no statistically significant difference in the degenerative condition of posterior ligaments, presence of degenerative spondylolisthesis, foraminal stenosis, diameter of the spinal canal, Modic alteration, and intervertebral discs degeneration at 10-year follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: The adjacent segment degeneration represents, in the present cohort, a result of the natural history of cervical spondylosis rather than a consequence of fusion.
METHODS: Patients from both subgroups received surgical indication according to the same criteria. Both subgroups underwent a cervical spine MRI in 2004-2005 and 10 years later in 2015. These MRI scans were retrospectively evaluated with a cervical spine ageing scale.
RESULTS: Comparing the two subset of patients both suffering from clinically relevant single-level disease returns no statistically significant difference in the degenerative condition of posterior ligaments, presence of degenerative spondylolisthesis, foraminal stenosis, diameter of the spinal canal, Modic alteration, and intervertebral discs degeneration at 10-year follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: The adjacent segment degeneration represents, in the present cohort, a result of the natural history of cervical spondylosis rather than a consequence of fusion.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAge FactorsAgingAnalysis of VarianceCervical VertebraeCohort StudiesDisease ProgressionDiskectomyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntervertebral Disc DegenerationMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentSpinal FusionTime FactorsTreatment Outcome