Brain metabolic response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to lesion network in cervical dystonia.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
A previous study identified a brain network underlying cervical dystonia (CD) based on causal brain lesions. This network was shown to be abnormal in idiopathic CD and aligned with connections mediating treatment response to deep brain stimulation, suggesting generalizability across etiologies and relevance for treatment. The main nodes of this network were located in the deep cerebellar structures and somatosensory cortex (S1), the latter of which can be easily reached via non-invasive brain stimulation. To date, there are no studies testing brain stimulation to networks identified using lesion network mapping.
OBJECTIVES
To assess target engagement by stimulating the S1 and testing the brain's acute metabolic response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in CD patients and healthy controls.
METHODS
Thirteen CD patients and 14 controls received a single session of continuous theta burst (cTBS) and sham to the right S1. Changes in regional brain glucose metabolism were measured using [18F]FDG-PET.
RESULTS
cTBS increased metabolism at the stimulation site in CD (P = 0.03) but not in controls (P = 0.15; group difference P = 0.01). In subcortical regions, cTBS increased metabolism in the brainstem in CD only (PFDR = 0.04). The remote activation was positively associated with dystonia severity and efficacy of sensory trick phenomenon in CD patients.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results provide further evidence of abnormal sensory system function in CD and show that a single session of S1 cTBS is sufficient to induce measurable changes in brain glucose metabolism. These findings support target engagement, motivating therapeutic trials of cTBS to the S1 in CD.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.