MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3171/jns.2000.93.6.1084

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of neurosurgery · 2000

Recurrent artery of Heubner: Otto Heubner's description of the artery and his influence on pediatrics in Germany.

Haroun R I, Rigamonti D, Tamargo R J

БиографияИсторическая статьяСтатьяPortraitПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Although the recurrent artery of Heubner is one of the best known cerebral arteries, little has been written in the neurosurgical or anatomical literature about its discovery. The artery is of primary importance to cerebrovascular surgeons, who identify it during clipping of anterior communicating artery aneurysms. Johann Otto Leonhardt Heubner (1843-1926), who described this artery in 1872, is better known as the father of German pediatrics. He was appointed to the first professorship in Germany exclusively devoted to pediatrics at the Charité Children's Clinic of Berlin University. Although he initially studied internal medicine in Leipzig under Carl Reinhold August Wunderlich and Ernst Leberecht Wagner, his early research involved anatomical studies of the circulation of the brain, from which he described syphilitic endarteritis (Heubner's disease). Finding morphological studies inconclusive, he turned to more physiological experiments. Together with the physiologist Max Rubner, Heubner performed important studies on energy metabolism in infancy, creating the notion of the nutrition quotient. In this article the authors review Heubner's life and scientific discoveries.

Для цитирования: Haroun R I, Rigamonti D, Tamargo R J. Recurrent artery of Heubner: Otto Heubner's description of the artery and his influence on pediatrics in Germany.. Journal of neurosurgery. 2000. DOI: 10.3171/jns.2000.93.6.1084.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.