MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.10.023

Медицинская библиотека · World neurosurgery · 2016

Implant Migration in Cervical Disk Arthroplasty.

Ozbek Zuhtu, Ozkara Emre, Arslantaş Ali

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to discuss the causes of implant migration after cervical arthroplasty with clinical cases.

METHODS

The patients who underwent cervical arthroplasty operations in our department between 2006 and 2015 because of cervical disk disease were retrospectively analyzed. The patients who were determined to be symptomatic of implant migration were evaluated.

RESULTS

Symptomatic implant migration was detected in 5 of 163 (0.3%) patients who underwent cervical disk arthroplasty, and these patients also underwent reoperation. In 4 patients who underwent reoperation, the prosthesis was removed, and an anterior fusion was made. The prosthesis was only removed in 1 patient.

CONCLUSIONS

The following situations should be considered in the prevention of dislocation and migration of the implant in cervical arthroplasty: protection of the structure of the end plate, selection of the appropriate implant size, and proper surgical construction. In the preoperative period, computed tomography scan may be useful for determining the implant size and details of the bone structure. Foreign body reactions or postoperative trauma may be a rare and unpreventable reason for prosthesis dislocation despite all of the preoperative and perioperative measures and well-made prosthesis designs.

Для цитирования: Ozbek Zuhtu, Ozkara Emre, Arslantaş Ali. Implant Migration in Cervical Disk Arthroplasty.. World neurosurgery. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.10.023.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.