Zhonghua bing li xue za zhi = Chinese journal of pathology · 2006
[Clonality study of palmar fibromatosis].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wang Lei, Zhu Hong-guang
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To study the clonality of palmar fibromatosis by molecular genetic analysis of X chromosome inactivation pattern at a polymorphic site of human androgen receptor gene (HUMARA).
METHODS: Twelve female cases of palmar fibromatosis were enrolled into this study. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections of paraffin-embedded, formalin-fixed tissues were microdissected by laser capture microdissection technology in order to obtain the proliferative spindle cells. Tumor cells isolated from rectal adenocarcinoma in a female patient were used as positive control. The genomic DNAs were extracted with phenol and chloroform, digested with methylation-sensitive restriction endonuclease HpaII, and amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primers targeted to a highly polymorphic short tandem repeat of HUMARA. The amplimers were separated on vertical 8% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gels and the patterns were visualized with ethidium bromide stain.
RESULTS: The methodology for clonality analysis was validated in the positive control using rectal adenocarcinoma cells. Among the 12 cases studied, PCR amplification failed in 3 samples and 1 sample showed homozygosity which was not suitable for further analysis. Eight samples were successfully amplified and showed a random X chromosome inactivation pattern, suggesting polyclonality in these lesions.
CONCLUSIONS: Palmar fibromatosis is a polyclonal condition and should be considered as a form of non-neoplasmic fibroblastic proliferation.
METHODS: Twelve female cases of palmar fibromatosis were enrolled into this study. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections of paraffin-embedded, formalin-fixed tissues were microdissected by laser capture microdissection technology in order to obtain the proliferative spindle cells. Tumor cells isolated from rectal adenocarcinoma in a female patient were used as positive control. The genomic DNAs were extracted with phenol and chloroform, digested with methylation-sensitive restriction endonuclease HpaII, and amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primers targeted to a highly polymorphic short tandem repeat of HUMARA. The amplimers were separated on vertical 8% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gels and the patterns were visualized with ethidium bromide stain.
RESULTS: The methodology for clonality analysis was validated in the positive control using rectal adenocarcinoma cells. Among the 12 cases studied, PCR amplification failed in 3 samples and 1 sample showed homozygosity which was not suitable for further analysis. Eight samples were successfully amplified and showed a random X chromosome inactivation pattern, suggesting polyclonality in these lesions.
CONCLUSIONS: Palmar fibromatosis is a polyclonal condition and should be considered as a form of non-neoplasmic fibroblastic proliferation.