Plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2025
Scaphocapitate Fusion and Proximal Row Carpectomy for Kienböck Disease: Comparative Analysis of Long-Term Outcomes.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Emanuels Andrew F, Rames Jess, Tunaboylu Mehmet Furkan, Bodansky David, Moran Steven L
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: In Kienböck disease with carpal collapse scaphocapitate fusion (SCF) and proximal row carpectomy (PRC), are mainstays of surgical treatment. This study analyzed objective and patient-reported outcomes after SCF or PRC in laborers versus nonlaborers.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent surgery for Kienböck disease within a single health system from 1976 to 2023 was conducted. Postoperative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) scores were surveyed from the available population. Labor status, grip, ROM, and return to the operating room were collected and radiographs were analyzed.
RESULTS: Sixty-four patients underwent PRC, and 78 underwent SCF. Patients with PRC were significantly older than patients with SCF. Mean follow-up was 29 months (SD, 53 months). There was no significant difference in postoperative ROM or relative grip strength between the cohort groups. Laborers who underwent SCF demonstrated the least disability on DASH scores. There was no significant difference in postoperative DASH scores in PRC when comparing laborers versus nonlaborers. In contrast, the DASH and PRWE scores of patients who underwent SCF postoperatively varied between laborers and nonlaborers (mean ± SD, 11.1 ± 13.9 versus 30.5 ± 24.8, P = 0.005; and 17.5 ± 19.4 versus 42.3 ± 31.4, P = 0.024). Patients who underwent SCF had a greater rate of revision surgery compared with the PRC group (22 of 78 versus 6 of 64; P = 0.026). Wrist fusion rates were 19% for SCF compared with 1.6% for PRC ( P = 0.0007).
CONCLUSIONS: SCF and PRC demonstrated no difference in postoperative ROM and grip based on labor status. Laborers with SCF had the least postoperative disability on DASH; however, SCF was associated with the need for additional surgical intervention and conversion to total wrist arthrodesis.
CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutc, III.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent surgery for Kienböck disease within a single health system from 1976 to 2023 was conducted. Postoperative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) scores were surveyed from the available population. Labor status, grip, ROM, and return to the operating room were collected and radiographs were analyzed.
RESULTS: Sixty-four patients underwent PRC, and 78 underwent SCF. Patients with PRC were significantly older than patients with SCF. Mean follow-up was 29 months (SD, 53 months). There was no significant difference in postoperative ROM or relative grip strength between the cohort groups. Laborers who underwent SCF demonstrated the least disability on DASH scores. There was no significant difference in postoperative DASH scores in PRC when comparing laborers versus nonlaborers. In contrast, the DASH and PRWE scores of patients who underwent SCF postoperatively varied between laborers and nonlaborers (mean ± SD, 11.1 ± 13.9 versus 30.5 ± 24.8, P = 0.005; and 17.5 ± 19.4 versus 42.3 ± 31.4, P = 0.024). Patients who underwent SCF had a greater rate of revision surgery compared with the PRC group (22 of 78 versus 6 of 64; P = 0.026). Wrist fusion rates were 19% for SCF compared with 1.6% for PRC ( P = 0.0007).
CONCLUSIONS: SCF and PRC demonstrated no difference in postoperative ROM and grip based on labor status. Laborers with SCF had the least postoperative disability on DASH; however, SCF was associated with the need for additional surgical intervention and conversion to total wrist arthrodesis.
CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutc, III.