MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/brs.0000000000004424

Медицинская библиотека · Spine · 2022

Elastic Lumbar Support Versus Rigid Thoracolumbar Orthosis for Acute Pediatric Spondylolysis: A Prospective Controlled Study.

Virkki Ella, Holstila Milja, Kolari Terhi, Lastikka Markus, Mattila Kimmo, Malmi Sari, Pajulo Olli, Helenius Ilkka

Рандомизированное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

STUDY

DESIGN

A prospective study on clinical, radiographic, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes in children with acute spondylolysis treated with a rigid thoracolumbar orthosis or with an elastic lumbar support.

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes of pediatric spondylosysis treated with a hard brace or an elastic lumbar support.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The benefits of the use of a rigid orthosis in treatment of spondylolysis are not clear.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Fifty-seven consecutive children with acute spondylolysis (mean age: 14.1 yr, range: 9-17 yr) were prospectively enrolled. Patients were treated with a rigid thoracolumbar orthosis (Boston brace) or with a low-profile, elastic lumbar support. First 14 patients were randomized the remaining 43 chose brace type themselves. Treatment period was four months. Treatment outcomes included bony union of the spondylolysis assessed with a computed tomography at four months and HRQoL using the Scoliosis Research Society-24 outcome questionnaire filled out before and after the treatment.

RESULTS

Of the 57 patients, 54 completed the treatment protocol. Twenty-nine patients were treated using the Boston brace and 25 patients the elastic lumbar support. Bony union was obtained in 69.0% (20/29) of the Boston brace and in 60.0% (15/25) of the elastic lumbar support group patients. Difference in union rates was not significant (relative risk=1.14, 95% confidence interval: 0.44-2.98, P =0.785). There was no difference in the Scoliosis Research Society-24 total or domain scores at the end of follow-up between the treatment groups ( P >0.159 for all comparisons). In the whole cohort, the bony union did not predict better HRQoL in the end of the treatment ( P =0.869), although the pain domain improved significantly in the whole cohort ( P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A rigid thoracolumbar orthosis did not provide any benefits over an elastic lumbar support in terms of bony union or HRQoL outcomes in children with acute spondylolysis.

LEVEL OF EVIDEN: 2.

Для цитирования: Virkki Ella, Holstila Milja, Kolari Terhi, Lastikka Markus, Mattila Kimmo, Malmi Sari, Pajulo Olli, Helenius Ilkka. Elastic Lumbar Support Versus Rigid Thoracolumbar Orthosis for Acute Pediatric Spondylolysis: A Prospective Controlled Study.. Spine. 2022. DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004424.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.