DOI 10.1016/j.jevs.2026.105863
Effects of various perineural analgesia techniques on decreasing experimentally-induced lameness of the equine metacarpophalangeal joint.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Recent evidence has shown that perineural analgesia may be less specific than previously thought.
AIMS/
OBJECTIVES
To compare the effects of four distal limb perineural analgesia techniques on resolving synovitis-induced lameness of the equine metacarpophalangeal joint (MCPJ).
METHODS
Nine horses had one MCPJ injected with 75 ng of recombinant equine interleukin-1β (reIL-1β). Ten hours later, horses underwent one of two blocking patterns: (1) a palmar digital (PDNB) followed by an abaxial sesamoidean (ASNB) nerve block or (2) a palmar metacarpal (PMNB) followed by a palmar (PaNB) nerve block. Skin sensitivity was evaluated four minutes post block. Lameness was assessed subjectively (Modified AAEP Grade 0-5) and objectively at five and ten minutes following each block. After a one-week washout period, lameness was induced in the opposite MCPJ, and the opposite blocking pattern was performed.
RESULTS
Mean subjective lameness post-reIL-1β injection was grade 3.2 and was not significantly improved following PDNBs or ASNBs. However, in two horses (2/9) lameness improved by ≥50 % five minutes post-PDNB. Mean subjective lameness significantly improved following PMNBs (grade 2.7 ± 0.8 at five and 2.2 ± 1.0 at ten minutes post-block; p < 0.03) and PaNBs (grade 1.5 ± 1.2 at five and 1.3 ± 1.3 at ten minutes post-block; p < 0.0001). Objective lameness scores followed a similar pattern, except the mean Q score did not significantly improve five minutes following the PMNB.
CONCLUSION
MCPJ lameness was most reliably improved following both PMNBs and PaNBs. In some instances, MCPJ pain was substantially improved following a PDNB.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.