Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2025
Enhancing diagnosis of gout with deep learning in dual-energy computed tomography: a retrospective analysis of crystal and artefact differentiation.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Choi Yunjung, Castro-Zunti Riel, Yun Jae Sung, Choi Younhee, Ko Seok-Bum, Choi Eun Jung, Jin Gong Yong, Yoo Wan-Hee, Park Eun Hae
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether the application of deep learning (DL) could achieve high diagnostic accuracy in differentiating between green colour coding, indicative of tophi, and clumpy artefacts observed in dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) scans.
METHODS: A comprehensive analysis of 18,704 regions of interest (ROIs) extracted from green foci in DECT scans obtained from 47 patients with gout and 27 gout-free controls was performed. The ROIs were categorized into three size groups: small, medium, and large. Convolutional neural network (CNN) analysis on a per-lesion basis and support vector machine (SVM) analysis on a per-patient basis were performed. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the models were compared.
RESULTS: For small ROIs, the sensitivity and specificity of the CNN model were 81.5% and 96.1%, respectively; for medium ROIs, 82.7% and 96.1%, respectively; for large ROIs, 91.8% and 86.9%, respectively. Additionally, the DL algorithm exhibited accuracies of 88.5%, 88.6%, and 91.0% for small, medium, and large ROIs, respectively. In the per-patient analysis, the SVM approach demonstrated a sensitivity of 87.2%, a specificity of 100%, and an accuracy of 91.8% in distinguishing between patients with gout and gout-free controls.
CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates the effectiveness of the DL algorithm in differentiating between green colour coding indicative of crystal deposition and clumpy artefacts in DECT scans. With high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, the utilization of DL in DECT for diagnosing gout enables precise lesion classification, facilitating early-stage diagnosis and promoting timely intervention approaches.
METHODS: A comprehensive analysis of 18,704 regions of interest (ROIs) extracted from green foci in DECT scans obtained from 47 patients with gout and 27 gout-free controls was performed. The ROIs were categorized into three size groups: small, medium, and large. Convolutional neural network (CNN) analysis on a per-lesion basis and support vector machine (SVM) analysis on a per-patient basis were performed. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the models were compared.
RESULTS: For small ROIs, the sensitivity and specificity of the CNN model were 81.5% and 96.1%, respectively; for medium ROIs, 82.7% and 96.1%, respectively; for large ROIs, 91.8% and 86.9%, respectively. Additionally, the DL algorithm exhibited accuracies of 88.5%, 88.6%, and 91.0% for small, medium, and large ROIs, respectively. In the per-patient analysis, the SVM approach demonstrated a sensitivity of 87.2%, a specificity of 100%, and an accuracy of 91.8% in distinguishing between patients with gout and gout-free controls.
CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates the effectiveness of the DL algorithm in differentiating between green colour coding indicative of crystal deposition and clumpy artefacts in DECT scans. With high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, the utilization of DL in DECT for diagnosing gout enables precise lesion classification, facilitating early-stage diagnosis and promoting timely intervention approaches.