MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/rheumatology/41.5.554

Медицинская библиотека · Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2002

Articular mobility in Maori and European New Zealanders.

Klemp P, Williams S M, Stansfield S A

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To determine the prevalence of hypermobility and of the hypermobility syndrome (HMS) in Maori and European New Zealanders.

METHODS

The prevalences of generalized hypermobility (Beighton's score > or = 4), of hypermobility at individual sites and of HMS were determined in 804 Maori and European subjects. Musculoskeletal system (MSS) manifestations were documented in all subjects by personal interview and an MSS examination. Radiographs were obtained where appropriate.

RESULTS

The percentage of hypermobile subjects was 6.2 for Maori (9.0 for females and 2.2 for males) and 4.0 for Europeans (5.6 and 1.9). Hypermobility was more prevalent in females (P=0.0001). Hypermobility of the elbow was more prevalent in Maori (P=0.003) and hyperextension of the fifth finger and apposition of thumb to forearm were more prevalent in females (P<0.001). HMS was present in two of 41 (4.9%, 95% confidence interval 0.6-17.6%) hypermobile subjects. Both were Maori females and therefore 2/23 hypermobile Maori females (8.7%, 1.1-31.4%) had HMS.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of hypermobility in Maori is similar to that in European New Zealanders and Caucasians elsewhere. Larger studies are necessary to determine the prevalence of HMS in Maori, particularly Maori females.

Для цитирования: Klemp P, Williams S M, Stansfield S A. Articular mobility in Maori and European New Zealanders.. Rheumatology (Oxford, England). 2002. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/41.5.554.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.