MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1227/neu.0000000000003506

Медицинская библиотека · Neurosurgery · 2025

Assessment of Flexion-Extension Motion After Occipitocervical and Atlantoaxial Fusion in Children.

Khan Hammad A, Dastagirzada Yosef M, Kurland David B, Anderson Daniela I, Brockmeyer Douglas, Pahys Joshua, Oetgen Matthew, Bauer Jennifer M, Lew Sean, Martin Jonathan, Harter David, Rodriguez-Olaverri Juan C, Anderson Richard C E, Pediatric Spine Study Group

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVES

Adult biomechanical studies suggest a significant reduction in flexion-extension motion after occipitocervical and atlantoaxial fusion. Anecdotal experience in children suggests a lower magnitude of reduction in motion after these procedures, but high-quality quantitative assessments of this motion have not yet been performed. As such, the aim of this study was to determine the magnitude of reduction in cervical spine flexion-extension after O-C2 and C1-2 fusion in pediatric patients.

METHODS

The Pediatric Spine Study Group international registry was queried for patients aged 21 years or younger who underwent O-C2 or C1-2 instrumentation and fusion. Patients with cervical spine flexion-extension radiographs preoperatively and ≥6 months postoperatively were included. Flexion, extension, and overall range of motion (ROM) of the cervical spine were measured on radiographs using McGregor line and the inferior endplate of C7.

RESULTS

In total, 34 patients were included, with 19 undergoing index O-C2 and 15 undergoing index C1-2 stabilization. The mean age was 9.3 ± 4.5 years with average follow-up of 3.5 ± 2.6 years. The most common etiologies were syndromic (n = 20) and congenital (n = 9). Patients undergoing O-C2 fusion had reduced neck extension (80° vs 69.6°, P = .003) and overall ROM (92.9° vs 80°, P = .002) after stabilization, but no significant reduction in flexion (-12.9° vs -10.4°, P = .324). After C1-2 fusion, there was no significant reduction in overall ROM (85.0° vs 77.5°, P = .079), extension (70.5° vs 63.4°, P = .120), or flexion (-14.6° vs -14.0°, P = .831).

CONCLUSION

In this cohort, children undergoing O-C2 stabilization had a 13.9% reduction in flexion-extension motion of the cervical spine, primarily due to a reduction in extension. There may be a smaller reduction in flexion-extension motion after stabilization in children when compared with adult studies. Further studies with video analysis including axial rotation and lateral bending will be necessary to comprehensively quantify cervical spine motion after fusion across the occipitocervical and atlantoaxial junctions.

Для цитирования: Khan Hammad A, Dastagirzada Yosef M, Kurland David B, Anderson Daniela I, Brockmeyer Douglas, Pahys Joshua, Oetgen Matthew, Bauer Jennifer M, Lew Sean, Martin Jonathan, Harter David, Rodriguez-Olaverri Juan C, Anderson Richard C E, Pediatric Spine Study Group. Assessment of Flexion-Extension Motion After Occipitocervical and Atlantoaxial Fusion in Children.. Neurosurgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000003506.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.