Clinical and Radiographic Assessment of Adult Function After Blount Disease in Childhood: An Exercise in Futility.

BACKGROUND

Few studies evaluate long-term function of patients with Blount disease. We sought to document patient radiographic and functional status 20 to 30 years after sugical treatment for infantile or adolescent Blount disease.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records and radiographs of patients operated at our institution for Blount disease between 1985 and 1995. Over a 4-year period, we recruited subjects for an IRB-approved call-back study.

RESULTS

One hundred five patients were eligible for the call-back study. Thirty-one (30%) had a criminal record, 18 of sufficient gravity to preclude invitation to return. Of the remaining 87, 40 (46%) could not be contacted. Of 47 with valid contact information, 10 (21%) were reported as deceased (although this could not be objectively confirmed), 20 (43%) did not respond or failed to show for assessment, and 1 (2%) declined to participate. 16 subjects returned at average age 36, 22 to 31 years post-index surgery. Body mass index (BMI) averaged 45.8 (range 23.9 to 67.6). Physical Score correlated most strongly and inversely with BMI ( P <0.01). Satisfaction with life correlated strongly and inversely with mechanical axis deviation ( P =0.02) and radiographic osteoarthritis of the knee ( P =0.02), but not BMI. There also was no correlation between severity of radiographic osteoarthritis and mechanical axis deviation ( P =0.46) or BMI ( P =0.52).

CONCLUSIONS

The small fraction of patients returning for evalutation minimize clinical conclusions that can be drawn from this study, despite an intensive 4-year effort to conduct it. Management of obesity and other socioeconomic characteristics are likely the most important aspects of treatment of patients with Blount disease. Our primary conclusion is that meaningful long-term functional studies of pediatric orthopaedic conditions will not be answered by retrospective call-back studies, and must be conducted within prospective registries and regular longitudinal follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III-Case-controlled study.