Shoulder joint stability after arthroscopic subacromial decompression.
Аннотация
In 55 patients with type I or type II impingement lesions we performed arthroscopic subacromial decompression. Fifty-two patients are followed up 1 year postoperatively. In all patients the condition of the affected shoulder before and after decompression was documented using a 100-point shoulder score (pain on activity, 15 points; pain without activity, 15 points; function, 20 points; weight lifting, 10 points; muscle strength, 15 points; range of motion, 25 points). At follow-up we also documented the extent of passive inferior shift of the humeral head by ultrasound. The mean score preoperatively was 60.9 (+/- 13.8). Postoperatively there was a significant increase to 84.7 (+/- 12.5). The average postoperative hospital stay was 8.8 days (+/- 2.1). In 12 patients (23%) the postoperative score was less than 85 points, and in these the treatment was considered to have failed. Comparison of these patients as a group with those in whom the treatment was successful revealed no difference in age, a small but not significant difference in the preoperative duration of shoulder complaints, and no difference in the postoperative length of stay in hospital. However, there was a significant difference in the extent of passive inferior shift of the humeral head: in the failure group the mean inferior shift was 4.6 +/- 1.9 mm, while in the other patients the shift was only 2.7 +/- 1.0 mm. This difference was statistically highly significant. There was a statistical highly significant negative Pearson correlation coefficient of -5.56 between postoperative score and inferior shift of the humeral head. We conclude that patients with subacromial pathology and hypermobile glenohumeral joints may not be good candidates for subacromial decompression.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.